| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/01/079687 [Registered on: 29/01/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
28/01/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Liquid biopsy guided addition of chemotherapy with TKI in advanced
EGFR mutated NSCLC. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Liquid biopsy guided addition of chemotherapy with TKI in advanced
EGFR mutated NSCLC: An open-label, multicentric, phase 3 randomized
controlled trial (LiquiACT) |
| Trial Acronym |
LiquiACT |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Prabhat Singh Malik |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NEW DELHI |
| Address |
Room no - 245, Department of medical oncology 2nd floor, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute of Rotary Cancer Hospital, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar New Delhi DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
09968325318 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drprabhatsm@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Prabhat Singh Malik |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NEW DELHI |
| Address |
Room no - 245, Department of medical oncology 2nd floor, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute of Rotary Cancer Hospital, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar
DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
09968325318 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drprabhatsm@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Prabhat Singh Malik |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NEW DELHI |
| Address |
Room no - 245, Department of medical oncology 2nd floor, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute of Rotary Cancer Hospital, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar
DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
09968325318 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drprabhatsm@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Indian Council of Medical Research |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Indian Council of Medical Research |
| Address |
V. Ramalingaswami Bhawan, P.O. Box No. 4911Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110029, India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government funding agency |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 2 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| DR PRABHAT SINGH MALIK |
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES |
Room -245, 2nd floor, Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute of rotary cancer hospital, ANSARI NAGAR South DELHI |
011-29575232
drprabhatsm@gmail.com |
| DR KUMAR PRABHASH |
Tata Memorial Centre |
Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, MUMBAI Mumbai MAHARASHTRA |
022-24177214
kprabhash1@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 2 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| INSTITUTE ETHICS COMMITTEE, AIIMS |
Approved |
| Institutional Ethics Committee, Tata Memorial Centre |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: C349||Malignant neoplasm of unspecifiedpart of bronchus or lung, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
gefitinib 250 mg or Osimertinib 80 mg |
Intervention arm will receive TKI of physician choice- gefitinib 250 mg per oral once a day or Osimertinib 80 mg per oral once a day. Blood sample would be collected at
baseline and 3 weeks for ct DNA assessment and would be reported by 4th week.
Patients with any of the high risk features, defined as baseline ctDNA positivity, TP53 co-mutation or persistent ctDNA at 3 weeks, would receive additional chemotherapy
with pemetrexed 500 mg per m2 with carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles
followed by maintenance pemetrexed 500 mg per m2 every 3 weeks till disease
progression or intolerance. Patients without high risk genomic features would continue on oral TKI alone till disease progression or intolerance. |
| Comparator Agent |
Gefitinib 250 mg or Osimertinib 80 mg with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 with carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 |
Control arm would receive TKI of physician choice (gefitinib 250 mg per oral once a
day or Osimertinib 80 mg per oral once day) and chemotherapy with pemetrexed 500
mg/m2 with carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by maintenance
pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks till disease progression or intolerance. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
70.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Age 18-70 years
2. Treatment naive patients with stage 3B and C (not amenable for curative intent treatment) and stage 4 disease (as per AJCC 8th edition)
3. ECOG performance status 0 and 1
4. Pathological diagnosis of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
5. Presence of sensitizing EGFR mutations (exon 19 del and L858R) detected
on either tissue or plasma ct DNA.
6. Adequate bone marrow functions defined as haemoglobin greater than or equal to 9 gm/dl,
absolute neutrophil counts greater than or equal to 1500 and platelet counts greater than or equal to 100,000.
7. Adequate renal functions defined as creatinine clearance (calculated by
Cockraft Gault formula) greater than or equal to 45 ml/min
8. Adequate hepatic functions defined as AST/ALT less than or equal to 2 times upper normal limit
and normal bilirubin. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Rare and compound EGFR mutations.
2. Symptomatic and untreated brain metastasis (treated and asymptomatic
brain metastasis would be allowed).
3. Pre-existing interstitial lung disease (symptomatic or radiological).
4. Pregnancy and lactation
5. HIV positive |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
On-site computer system |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Overall survival rates in the intention to treat population, defined as time
from enrolment till death or 2 years for all enrolled patients |
Overall survival rates at 2 years |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
a. Toxicity profile,
b. Quality of life,
c. Progression free survival, and
d. Cost analysis of both approaches |
Over the entire study period |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="354" Sample Size from India="354"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
10/02/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="3" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
EGFR (Epidermal Growth
Factor Receptor) mutations are prevalent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC),
representing approximately 25-30% of cases in Indian patients. These mutations are pivotal
in guiding treatment decisions, as they provide a critical therapeutic target.
The introduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) has brought about a
transformative shift in the treatment landscape for patients with EGFR-mutated
advanced NSCLC. Moreover, the integration
of various combination approaches, such as the addition of chemotherapy or
antiangiogenic agents to TKIs, has further improved survival rates and has come
to define a new standard of care. However, this advancement comes at the cost of higher rates of
toxicities, increased cost of treatment and frequent hospital visits,
warranting a more precise and adaptable approach to treatment.
Despite the progress made,
the clinical course of EGFR-mutated NSCLC remains highly variable among
patients. One of the primary contributing factors to this variability is the
emergence of secondary resistance mechanisms. This complexity underscores the necessity
for closely monitoring treatment response and detecting resistance as early as
possible, as these factors hold the key to optimizing patient outcomes. In this
context, liquid biopsy using plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) kinetics has
emerged as a valuable tool for assessing disease progression and guiding
treatment decisions in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients on TKIs.
CtDNA is the fragmented DNA
released by tumor cells into the bloodstream. It can be extracted from a
simple blood sample, making it a non-invasive and easily accessible biomarker
using various technologies like RT-PCR, droplet digital PCR and next generation
sequencing. Unlike tissue biopsies, which are invasive, ctDNA analysis allows
for frequent monitoring of disease status without subjecting patients to
repeated invasive and risky procedures. This non-invasive nature of ctDNA
monitoring is particularly advantageous in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, as it
can potentially allow for timely adjustments to treatment regimens. The
longitudinal evaluation of ct DNA has several advantages like, early response
monitoring, assessment of minimal residual disease and early detection of emergence of therapeutic resistance.
Various studies have shown
that early clearance of plasma ct DNA (3 weeks to 9 weeks) while on TKI is
associated with significantly better survival in EGFR mutated advanced NSCLC.
Whether treatment
modifications guided by ctDNA kinetics can provide a better option, is not yet
known. Several single arm phase 2 trials, including one at our centre are
currently evaluating the feasibility of this approach.
We intend to answer if
adding chemotherapy to only patients with high risk factors like base line
ctDNA positivity, TP53 co-mutations or persistent plasma ct DNA after 3 weeks
of TKI monotherapy results in non-inferior overall survival as compared to
TKI-chemotherapy combination. Using this personalised approach, we would be
able to avoid toxicities of chemotherapy, need of frequent hospital visits and
associated cost in good risk patients. This study would generate the best
quality evidence for the integration of liquid biopsy in routine clinical
decision making. This approach would also give us an opportunity of
understanding the ctDNA kinetics, timing of resistance emergence, and its
mechanism in Indian patients of EGFR mutated NSCLC. |