| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/11/077055 [Registered on: 19/11/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
01/03/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Probiotic |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
ROLE OF PROBIOTICS ON MUSCLE WEAKNESS & MASS IN ADVANCED LIVER DISEASE |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Probiotics with Standard Medical Treatment versus Standard Medical Treatment alone in patients with Frailty in Decompensated Cirrhosis: An Open Label Randomised Trial |
| Trial Acronym |
PROF Study |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
SUNIL TANEJA |
| Designation |
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER ,CHANDIGARH |
| Address |
Department of Hepatology, NHE, PGIMER, Sector 12,Chandigarh Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
09592160444 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drsuniltaneja@hotmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
SAVNEET SINGH |
| Designation |
SENIOR RESIDENT |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER ,CHANDIGARH |
| Address |
Department of Hepatology, NHE, PGIMER, Sector 12,Chandigarh Department of Hepatology, NHE, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160012
India Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
7009654592 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
singhsavneet337@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
SAVNEET SINGH |
| Designation |
SENIOR RESIDENT |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER ,CHANDIGARH |
| Address |
Department of Hepatology, NHE, PGIMER, Sector 12,Chandigarh Department of Hepatology, NHE, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160012
India Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
7009654592 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
singhsavneet337@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| DEPARTMENT OF HEPATOLOGY, PGIMER CHANDIGARH, SECTOR 12, CHANDIGARH, INDIA, PIN-160012 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
PGIMER |
| Address |
Department of Hepatology, NHE, PGIMER, Chandigarh
|
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Savneet Singh |
PGIMER CHANDIGARH |
Room Number :31 ,Department of hepatology Chandigarh CHANDIGARH |
7009654592
singhsavneet337@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Instiutional Ethics Committee, PGIMER,Chandigarh |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K746||Other and unspecified cirrhosis ofliver, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
PROBIOTIC |
The intervention group will receive Probiotic along with the standard medical therapy where as the comparator arm will receive only standard medical treatment |
| Comparator Agent |
Standard Medical Therapy |
The intervention group will receive Probiotic along with the standard medical therapy where as the comparator arm will receive only standard medical treatmen |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
75.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Age 18-75 years.
2. Patient of decompensated cirrhosis of any aetiology.
3. Presence of frailty. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Patients with CTP score more than 10
2. Patients with allergy to probiotics
3. Patient with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF)
4. Patients with active malignancy, hepatocellular carcinoma and
end- stage renal disease
5. Patients having prior study enrolment or enrolment in another
conflicting study.
6. Patients, who are not willing to participate in the study.
7. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials within past 3
months.
8. Patients who has an active evidence of infection
9. Patients who had acute organic brain disease in the past 6
months
10.Patients who has severe hemodynamic instability, serious heart
disease, severe bradycardia or tachycardia at rest
11. Patients having renal failure (creatinine clearance rate ?60
mL/min/1.73 m2).
12. Patients with severe cognitive impairment, overt hepatic
encephalopathy or patients who
had physical disability.
13. Patients with HIV
14. Pregnancy
15. Post liver transplant patients
16. Exposure to probiotics in the previous 12 weeks
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To see the effect of probiotics on frailty in
decompensated cirrhosis as measured by Liver Frailty Index (LFI) |
To see the effect of probiotics on frailty in
decompensated cirrhosis as measured by Liver Frailty Index (LFI) at three and six months |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To see change in prognostic scores (CTP/
MELD/ MELD Na) at 6 month
•To see change in levels of inflammatory
markers and ammonia at 6 month
•To see change in sarcopenia (skeletal muscle
at L3 vertebral level on CT) at 6 month
•Survival & hospitalisation
•Change in quality of life at 6 month
•Adverse events as per World Health
Organization (WHO grading) |
Patients will be enrolled in an expected period of 18 months
Patients will be followed up for their final
outcomes for next 6 months with measurements of various outcomes at baseline, three and at 6 month |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="102" Sample Size from India="102"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
27/11/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
Publication Details
Modification(s)
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
Brief Summary
Modification(s)
|
Cirrhosis of the liver represents an advanced stage of liver disease characterized by progressive necro-inflammation within the liver, leading to liver fibrosis and vascular remodelling. Histologically, cirrhosis is defined by nodule formation surrounded by dense fibrotic septa, resulting in the distortion of liver architecture (1-2). Cirrhosis carries a high mortality risk due to complications such as jaundice, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatic encephalopathy, and gastrointestinal bleeding. It is increasingly recognized as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality related to liver diseases (1). Frailty is clinically defined as a state of reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to health stressors (3). It is characterized by impaired muscle contractile function and is influenced by mechanisms such as oxidative stress, dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines, malnutrition, physical inactivity, and muscle apoptosis. Sarcopenia, a progressive skeletal muscle disorder, is closely associated with frailty and increases the risk of adverse outcomes such as falls, fractures, disability, and mortality (4). The prevalence of sarcopenia in cirrhosis ranges from 40% to 70%, while frailty ranges from 18% to 43% (5-6). Physical frailty encompasses multiple dimensions of muscle health, including sarcopenia, disability, reduced energy expenditure, and malnutrition. Recent discussions in the American Society of Transplantation consensus statement highlight that frailty includes broader aspects such as muscle function and the subjective experience of frailty by patients (7). Numerous studies underscore physical frailty as a robust independent predictor of transplant waitlist and post-transplant mortality, mortality after hospitalization, hospital length of stay, and discharge location (6-12).Frailty in cirrhosis has emerged as an independent predictor of outcomes such as transplant waitlist mortality, post-transplant mortality, mortality following hospitalization, length of hospital stay, and discharge destination (6-12). One of the primary risk factors contributing to frailty in cirrhosis is compromised liver function itself. The liver plays essential roles in metabolism, detoxification, and protein synthesis. As liver function declines in cirrhosis, these critical processes are disrupted, leading to malnutrition, muscle wasting, and metabolic disturbances. These physiological changes reduce overall physical reserve and functional capacity, predisposing patients to frailty. Malnutrition is another significant contributor to frailty in cirrhotic patients. The liver’s impaired ability to metabolize and store nutrients results in deficiencies of essential vitamins, minerals, and proteins. This nutritional imbalance exacerbates muscle wasting, compromises immune function, and delays wound healing—key features of frailty. Poor dietary intake, often compounded by appetite loss and dietary restrictions, further increases the risk of malnutrition in these patients.(13) The presence of comorbidities commonly seen in cirrhosis, such as diabetes mellitus,cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease, also contributes to frailty. These conditions not only complicate the management of cirrhosis but also independently increasethe risk of functional decline and disability.(14) Emerging evidence suggests that alterations in gut microbiota composition and function can contribute to the development and progression of liver frailty through several mechanisms: 1. Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction: The gut microbiota helps maintain the integrity of the intestinal barrier. Dysbiosis can lead to increased gut permeability (leaky gut), allowing microbial products such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) to translocate from thegut lumen into systemic circulation. Elevated LPS levels trigger immune responses and inflammation, which can promote liver injury and fibrosis.(15) 2. Microbial Metabolites: Gut microbes metabolize dietary components into bioactive metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, and trimethylamine- N-oxide (TMAO). These metabolites can influence liver function directly or indirectly. For example, SCFAs possess anti-inflammatory properties and may help protect against liver damage, while TMAO has been associated with cardiovascular and liver diseases.(16) 3. Immune Modulation: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in shaping the development and function of the immune system. Dysbiosis can disrupt immune homeostasis, leading to chronic inflammation and immune activation, which contribute to liver inflammation, fibrosis, and cirrhosis.(17) 4. Metabolic Syndrome and NAFLD: Dysbiosis is linked to metabolic syndrome,characterized by obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension. These metabolic abnormalities are risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD), a prevalent cause of liver disease globally. Gut dysbiosis may promote hepatic lipid accumulation and inflammation, exacerbating NAFLD progression.(18) 5. Hepatic Encephalopathy: In patients with liver cirrhosis, gut-derived toxins like ammonia and mercaptans bypass liver detoxification and accumulate in the brain, causing hepatic encephalopathy. Alterations in gut microbiota composition and function contribute to increased ammonia production and impaired gut barrier function, worsening neurological symptoms(19). Probiotics, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), are living organisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits to the host (20). Studies have demonstrated that probiotics act on the gut-liver axis, resulting in reduced ammonia production and improved intestinal permeability. This mechanism ultimately leads to decreased hyperammonaemia and improvement in hepatic encephalopathy. (21). Probiotics have also been shown to reduce the levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1) in skeletal muscle (18). Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that probiotics could have other beneficial effects on the course of cirrhosis by modulating the gut microbiome and affecting the gut-liver axis. This modulation can interfere with major pathophysiological events underlying decompensated cirrhosis, such as systemic inflammatory syndrome, portal hypertension, and bacterial infections (22). Long-term treatment with probiotics appears to consistently reduce the rate of hepatic encephalopathy-related and all-cause hospitalizations, without increasing the risk of adverse events. Probiotics also show a low propensity for selecting resistant bacterial mutants, indicating no increased risk of infection with prolonged exposure (23). However, the effects of probiotics alone on frailty progression in patients with cirrhosis remain unclear. Hence, this study is planned to investigate the effect of probiotics on frailty in decompensated cirrhosis. |