FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2024/11/076208 [Registered on: 04/11/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 03/11/2024
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Radiation Therapy 
Study Design  Single Arm Study 
Public Title of Study   A prospective single arm study of cytokine analyses in evaluation of radiation induced lymphopenia in cancers 
Scientific Title of Study   LymphoTEC2- A prospective single arm phase 2 study of cytokine analyses in evaluation of radiation induced lymphopenia in cancers 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Prashanth G 
Designation  Assistant Professor 
Affiliation  Tata Memorial centre 
Address  Department of Radiation Oncology MPMMCC/ HBCH Varanasi

Varanasi
UTTAR PRADESH
221005
India 
Phone  08098281729  
Fax    
Email  prashanth.jipmer@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Prashanth G 
Designation  Assistant Professor 
Affiliation  Tata Memorial centre 
Address  Department of Radiation Oncology
MPMMCC/ HBCH Varanasi
Varanasi
UTTAR PRADESH
221005
India 
Phone  08098281729  
Fax    
Email  prashanth.jipmer@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Prashanth G 
Designation  Assistant Professor 
Affiliation  Tata Memorial centre 
Address  Department of Radiation Oncology
MPMMCC/ HBCH Varanasi

UTTAR PRADESH
221005
India 
Phone  08098281729  
Fax    
Email  prashanth.jipmer@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Intramural TRAC fund MPMMCC Varanasi (A Unit of Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai) PIN: 221005  
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Tata Memorial Centre 
Address  Parel, Mumbai, India PIN: 400012 
Type of Sponsor  Research institution and hospital 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Prashanth G  MPMMCC Varanasi  Clinical trial coordinator room Ground floor Department of Radiation Oncology MPMMCC/ HBCH Varanasi
Varanasi
UTTAR PRADESH 
08098281729

prashanth.jipmer@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
MPMMCC/HBCH VARANASI  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: C340||Malignant neoplasm of main bronchus, (2) ICD-10 Condition: C103||Malignant neoplasm of posterior wall of oropharynx, (3) ICD-10 Condition: C61||Malignant neoplasm of prostate,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  LymphoTEC guideline based constraint to heart, lung, bone, spleen  LymphoTEC guideline based constraint to heart, lung, bone, spleen Duration of intervention: 5 - 7 weeks Frequency : Daily 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Patients receiving external beam radiotherapy only with curative intent to head and neck, central nervous system, abdomen, thorax or pelvis for malignancy
Equivalent dose of 2 Gy EQD2 of radiotherapy planned is to be higher or equal to 50 Gy
All relevant LymphoTEC guidelines dose constraints to be met during planning
Baseline blood lymphocyte count more than 800/mm3
Patients must be more than 18 years of age, have the ability to understand, and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 2 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Lymphocyte count less than 800
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 3 or higher
Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy, immunotherapy or concurrent hormonal therapy (Eg: Androgen deprivation therapy)
Patients receiving radiotherapy with a palliative intent
Patients receiving radiotherapy to a EQD2 of less than 50 Gy 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Not Applicable 
Method of Concealment   Not Applicable 
Blinding/Masking   Not Applicable 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
• Correlate serum levels of cytokines IL7, IL 15 and TGF beta at baseline with incidence of acute lymphopenia (within 4 months of radiotherapy) (CTCAE v5: Grade 3 or higher)  Baseline
3 weeks of radiotherapy 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
• Evaluate serum levels of IL7 and IL15 at onset of acute Grade 3 or higher lymphopenia for presence or absence of compensatory increase   2 months 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="88"
Sample Size from India="88" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   15/11/2024 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="2"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Open to Recruitment 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

Therapeutic ratio forms the guiding principle of radiation planning and treatment delivery (1). One of the early attempts to provide a guidance tool for limiting normal organ injury was Emami et al study published in 1991 that provided a consensus framework of normal tissue radiation dose limits and tissue complication probability as TD 5/5 (the probability of 5% complication within five years from treatment) and TD 50 / 5 (the probability of 50% complication within five years) (2). The advent of modern radiation techniques such as inverse planning and image guidance as well as increased use of concurrent systemic therapy posed new challenges to optimally define the normal organ tissue constraints. This led to the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) framework published in 2010 based on the dose/volume/outcome data (3,4). Further understanding of the differential radiation sensitivity of the normal tissues in growing children compared to adults led to the Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) initiative (5). The evolution of stereotactic body radiation therapy and hypo fractionation has led to the High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) initiative (6).

In recent times, modulating the immune system with immunotherapy, CAR T cell therapy etc is being tried to improve cancer control. Lymphocytes form the central dogma of cancer immunotherapy paradigm. T cells recognize proteins that are presented by MHC molecules through a process of antigen presentation. CD8+ T cells recognize MHC class 1 presented molecules and are cytotoxic to cancer cells. Some of these T cells that recognize cancer cells evolve into memory cells and are conditioned to respond strongly to re-challenge by the same antigen (7). Radiation is an integral component of cancer treatment in solid malignancies. Interestingly, lymphocytes are the most radiosensitive cells in the body mainly due to the lack of adequate DNA repair machinery. Radiation related lymphopenia was identified as early as the 1930s but its impact on tumor control and overall survival outcomes has been correlated recently (8). Multiple reports have shown that radiation delivery for tumors in close proximity to lymphoid organs such as bone marrow, spleen, or unintended radiation to circulating pools of lymphocytes traversing organs such as heart and lung is known to deplete the circulating lymphocyte populations


[9–12]. Multiple retrospective and small prospective studies have shown radiation related lymphopenia to be associated with detrimental survival endpoints [13 – 17]. Currently, there are no standardized dose constraints that are available to limit the radiation dose to the resident and circulating lymphocyte populations. This is much more pertinent in the current immunotherapy era wherein ongoing clinical trials are trying to optimally time and sequence radiation and immunotherapy combinations for potentially synergistic and or additive effects [18].

We performed a systematic review of studies in published literature to create the LymphoTEC guideline of dose constraint for reduction of radiation related lymphopenia (attached in appendix). The LymphoTEC guideline (published in radiotherapy and oncology 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.019) provides an initial framework for dosimetric constraints to reduce radiation related lymphopenia. The studies included in the generation of the guideline is summarized in appendix 1.0. The authors of the guideline conclude that ‘The dose constraints described herein may be considered for prospective validation and future use in clinical trials to limit risk of radiation-related lymphopenia.’ The prospective validation is much more pertinent in the current immunotherapy era wherein ongoing clinical trials are trying to optimally time and sequence radiation and immunotherapy combinations for potentially synergistic and or additive effects [19]. We therefore attempted a prospective validation study wherein dose constraints proposed by LymphoTEC was applied to a homogenous population of prostate cancer receiving pelvic radiotherapy (MPMMCC Study ID: 11000598; Approval date: 28/10/2022). A total of 42 patients were recruited in the single arm cohort study between November 2022 and November 2023. All patients included (n = 42) in study were high risk prostate cancer as per the NCCN criteria. All patients received pelvic and prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) to a dose of 68 Gray in 25 fractions to the prostate and 50 Gray in 25 fractions to the pelvis. The study assumption was that if 2 of 3 constraints (LymphoTEC) are met i.e. V10 pelvic bone < 80%, V40 pelvic bone < 600 cc and Mean Body dose < 15 Gy, acute grade 3 lymphopenia with RT will decrease from 50% to 25%.  In the study, (MPMMCC Study ID: 11000598) all patients completed planned course of radiotherapy without interruptions. 38 patients were included in final analysis. 4 patients were excluded from final analysis as they received short course steroids for obstructing voiding symptoms or antibiotics for suspected urinary tract infection during course of pelvic radiotherapy (n = 2 each).

The study dosimetric constraints i.e. atleast 2 of 3 parameters was met in all patients. Median Mean body dose was 14.3 Gy (Range: 12.79 Gy – 16.49 Gy). Median V10 pelvic bone was 81 % (Range: 63.4% - 95 %) and Median V40 was 241 cc (Range: 139 cc – 452 cc). Pelvic bone V40 < 600 cc was met in all patients (n = 38). Pelvic bone V10 < 80% and mean body dose < 15 Gy was met in 23 (60.5%) and 29 (76.3%) patients respectively. All 3 constraints were met in 21 (55.2%) patients.

The median baseline lymphocyte count was 1930 / mm3 (Range: 950 – 3440 / mm3). Grade 3 or higher lymphopenia (i.e. < 500 / mm3) occurred in 22 (57.9%) patients while grade 2 lymphopenia (< 800 / mm3) occurred in 37 (97.4%) patients. On chi square testing, baseline lymphocyte count being < median (1930/ mm3) was significantly associated with grade 3 or higher lymphopenia (p = 0.02). All constraints being met, dose rate (> 1000 MU vs 600 MU) and V10 Pelvic bone < 80% was not statistically associated with lymphopenia rates.

The results of the study showed that baseline lymphocyte count seems to be the most important predictor of lymphopenia with RT. Dosimetric constraints alone could not reliably prevent radiation induced lymphopenia.

The possible reasons for failure of hypothesis of LymphoTEC GU may be – first at any given time, 70% of lymphocytes reside in lymph nodes while only 5% reside in blood. Nodal irradiation is therefore expected to cause lymphopenia even if radiation dose to rest of blood pool and marrow are restricted. Second, lymphocyte homeostasis also depends on interleukins like levels of IL7, IL 15 and also TGF beta 1 in blood (mechanisms explained below) [20, 22]. At onset of lymphopenia due to other causes (not RT), compensatory increase in IL7 and IL15 has been shown in various studies which in turn leads to increased lymphocyte count. In patients receiving radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT) developing lymphopenia, studies have resulted in conflicting results.  In a study by Ellsworth et al. [23]. patients with high-grade glioma treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy showed lymphocyte depletion, but no increase in IL-7 levels. Contrary to this, a study by Byun et al on hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving radiotherapy, compensatory rise of IL7 at onset of severe lymphopenia was documented. [24]. Interestingly, murine studies have also shown that lympho-depletion due to radiotherapy alone is not associated with a compensatory increase in the homeostatic T cell cytokines Interleukin-7 and Interleukin-15. Murine studies have also suggested that use of IL15 super-agonist could possible alleviate RIL and survival [21]. The above human studies had the confounding of chemotherapy (Ellsworth et al) and absence of utilization of any dose constraints to mitigate lymphopenia. In the absence of clear data, it is imperative to perform a prospective study using LymphoTEC dose constraints and correlate with cytokine levels.

Studies have also shown that hypo-fractionated radiotherapy and SBRT have led to less incidence of RIL [25, 26]. However, as ultra-hypofractionation is not technically feasible due to risk of toxicity in subsites like head and neck, CNS and abdomen, it is necessary that evaluation of role of cytokines in RIL with conventional or moderate hypofractionation (Dose per fraction < 3 Gy) be made as these fractionations are expected to be used more commonly in combination with immunotherapy in future.

Due to the above factors, we attempt to perform a study of cytokine levels and correlation with lymphopenia while utilizing the proposed LymphoTEC guidelines. If cytokines IL7, IL15 and TGFBeta1 independently predict acute lymphopenia and there is absence of compensatory rise in cytokine levels after RT, it paves way for future drug trials with cytokine super agonist before or during RT, particularly when planned with immunotherapy. As dose constraints alone failed to mitigate lymphopenia in LymphoTEC GU study (MPMMCC Study ID: 11000598), it is possible that multifactorial intervention i.e. cytokine super-agonist along with dose constraints may help alleviate RIL.

IL 7 and lymphocyte homeostasis:

T-cell homeostasis in the peripheral lymphoid compartment is rigorously regulated through turnover, survival, and death. IL-7 promotes T-cell survival by upregulating the expression level of the Bcl-2 family of molecules, especially Mcl-1 (Anti-apoptotic) and Bcl-2, which can extensively inhibit the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [27]. In addition to dependence on a dynamic balance of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic signals, IL-7 also affects glucose metabolism which is also critical for T-cell survival. Research has also shown that expression of IL-7 and CCL19 significantly improves T-cell infiltration and survival of CAR-T cells in mouse tumors, enhancing the anti-tumor activity against solid tumors [28]. The data cited indicates that IL 7 levels appear critical to maintain T cell levels. However, if downstream pathways like BcL 2 molecules are impaired, levels of IL 7 may not correlate with lymphopenia. In other words, if downstream effector molecules/ pathways are deranged with radiotherapy, a compensatory rise in IL 7 may not correlate with increased lymphocyte levels. Such a finding should stimulate further lab research in that direction.

IL 15 and lymphocyte homeostasis:

IL-15 promotes lymphocyte cell survival during lymphopenia through JAK/STAT and PI3K/AKT pathway-mediated regulation of both anti- and pro-apoptotic factors of the Bcl-2 protein family. In addition to regulation by Bcl2 family proteins, IL-15 could regulate homeostatic cell survival by modulating several ER stress response proteins through an unknown mechanism, thus inhibiting survival defects induced by intense ER stress and PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) expression [29, 30]. The data cited indicates that IL 15 levels appear critical to maintain T cell levels. However, if downstream pathways like BcL 2 molecules or PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) expression are impaired, levels of IL 15 may not correlate with lymphopenia. In other words, if downstream effector molecules/ pathways are deranged with radiotherapy, a compensatory rise in IL 15 may not correlate with increased lymphocyte levels. Such a finding should stimulate further lab research in that direction.

TGF beta and lymphocyte homeostasis:

TGF-β1 primarily helps in maintaining immune homeostasis and prevention of autoimmunity. Naive T cells released from thymus must interact with self-MHC to survive in the periphery. Self-activation is normally inhibited because [Ca2+]i levels are not sufficient for synergy with costimulatory pathways. TGF-β1-deficient T cells have spontaneously high [Ca2+]i levels, which alters the threshold level for activation upon TCR/MHC interaction. Upon self-Ag recognition they become activated, cause an autoimmune-type inflammatory response [31, 32]. TGF Beta therefor normally prevents auto-immunity. But in cancer, recognition of Tumor associated antigens (TAAs) is essential. Elevated TGF beta levels may lead to T cells not getting activated even if no lymphopenia is present. This in turn may prevent recognition of Tumor associated antigens (TAAs) and therefore poorer cancer control. The present study will look to document TGF beta levels at start of RT and look to correlate with initial lymphocyte counts. To decipher complete role of TGF beta further lab studies must be planned in future

 
Close