Therapeutic ratio forms the guiding
principle of radiation planning and treatment delivery (1). One of the early attempts to provide a guidance tool for
limiting normal organ injury was Emami et al study published in 1991 that provided a consensus framework of normal
tissue radiation dose limits and tissue complication probability as TD 5/5 (the probability of 5% complication
within five years from treatment) and TD 50 / 5 (the probability of 50% complication within five years) (2). The
advent of modern radiation techniques such as inverse planning and image guidance as well as increased use of
concurrent systemic therapy posed new challenges to optimally define the normal organ tissue constraints. This led
to the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) framework published in 2010
based on the dose/volume/outcome data (3,4). Further understanding of the differential radiation sensitivity of the normal tissues
in growing children
compared to adults
led to the Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic
(PENTEC) initiative (5). The evolution of stereotactic body radiation therapy and hypo fractionation has led to the High
Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC)
initiative (6).
In recent times, modulating the
immune system with immunotherapy, CAR T cell therapy etc is being tried to improve cancer control. Lymphocytes form
the central dogma of cancer immunotherapy paradigm. T cells recognize proteins
that are presented by MHC molecules
through a process of antigen presentation. CD8+ T cells recognize MHC class 1
presented molecules and are cytotoxic to cancer cells.
Some of these
T cells that recognize cancer
cells evolve into memory
cells and are conditioned to respond strongly to re-challenge by the same antigen (7). Radiation is an integral
component of cancer treatment in solid malignancies. Interestingly, lymphocytes
are the most radiosensitive cells in the body mainly due to the lack of
adequate DNA repair machinery. Radiation related
lymphopenia was identified as early as the 1930s but its impact on tumor
control and overall survival outcomes
has been correlated recently (8). Multiple reports have shown that radiation
delivery for tumors in close proximity
to lymphoid organs such as bone marrow, spleen, or unintended radiation to
circulating pools of lymphocytes traversing organs such as heart and lung is known to deplete the circulating lymphocyte populations
[9–12]. Multiple retrospective and
small prospective studies have shown radiation related lymphopenia to be associated with detrimental survival
endpoints [13 – 17]. Currently, there are no standardized dose constraints that are available to limit the radiation
dose to the resident and circulating lymphocyte populations. This is much more pertinent in the current
immunotherapy era wherein ongoing clinical trials are trying to optimally time
and sequence radiation and
immunotherapy combinations for potentially synergistic and or additive effects
[18].
We performed a systematic
review of studies in published literature to create the LymphoTEC guideline of
dose constraint for reduction of radiation related lymphopenia (attached in
appendix). The LymphoTEC
guideline (published in radiotherapy and oncology 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.019)
provides an initial framework for dosimetric constraints to reduce radiation related
lymphopenia. The studies included in the generation of the guideline is
summarized in appendix 1.0. The authors of the guideline conclude that ‘The dose constraints described herein may be
considered for prospective validation and future use in clinical trials to
limit risk of radiation-related lymphopenia.’ The prospective validation
is much more pertinent in the current
immunotherapy era wherein ongoing clinical trials are trying to optimally time
and sequence radiation and
immunotherapy combinations for potentially synergistic and or additive effects
[19]. We therefore attempted a
prospective validation study wherein
dose constraints proposed by LymphoTEC was applied to a homogenous population
of prostate cancer receiving pelvic radiotherapy (MPMMCC Study ID: 11000598; Approval date: 28/10/2022). A total of
42 patients were recruited in the single arm cohort study between November 2022
and November 2023. All patients included (n = 42) in study were high risk
prostate cancer as per the NCCN criteria. All patients received pelvic and
prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated
radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) to a dose of 68
Gray in 25 fractions to the prostate and 50 Gray in 25 fractions to the pelvis.
The study assumption was that if 2 of 3
constraints (LymphoTEC) are met i.e. V10 pelvic bone < 80%, V40 pelvic bone
< 600 cc and Mean Body dose < 15 Gy, acute grade 3 lymphopenia with RT
will decrease from 50% to 25%. In the study, (MPMMCC Study ID: 11000598) all
patients completed planned course of radiotherapy without interruptions. 38
patients were included in final analysis. 4 patients were excluded from final
analysis as they received short course steroids for obstructing voiding
symptoms or antibiotics for suspected urinary tract infection during course of
pelvic radiotherapy (n = 2 each).
The study dosimetric constraints i.e. atleast 2 of 3 parameters was met
in all patients. Median Mean body dose was 14.3 Gy (Range: 12.79 Gy – 16.49
Gy). Median V10 pelvic bone was 81 % (Range: 63.4% - 95 %) and Median V40 was
241 cc (Range: 139 cc – 452 cc). Pelvic bone V40 < 600 cc was met in all
patients (n = 38). Pelvic bone V10 < 80% and mean body dose < 15 Gy was
met in 23 (60.5%) and 29 (76.3%) patients respectively. All 3 constraints were
met in 21 (55.2%) patients.
The median baseline lymphocyte count was 1930 / mm3 (Range:
950 – 3440 / mm3). Grade 3 or higher lymphopenia (i.e. < 500 / mm3) occurred in 22
(57.9%) patients while grade 2 lymphopenia (< 800 / mm3) occurred in 37 (97.4%)
patients. On chi square testing, baseline lymphocyte count being <
median (1930/ mm3) was significantly associated with grade 3 or higher
lymphopenia (p = 0.02). All constraints being
met, dose rate (> 1000 MU vs 600 MU) and V10 Pelvic bone < 80% was not
statistically associated with lymphopenia rates.
The results of the study showed that baseline
lymphocyte count seems to be the most important predictor of lymphopenia with
RT. Dosimetric
constraints alone could not reliably prevent radiation induced lymphopenia.
The possible reasons for failure of hypothesis of LymphoTEC GU may be –
first at any given time, 70% of lymphocytes reside in lymph nodes while only 5%
reside in blood. Nodal irradiation is therefore expected to cause lymphopenia
even if radiation dose to rest of blood pool and marrow are restricted. Second,
lymphocyte homeostasis also depends on interleukins like levels of IL7, IL 15
and also TGF beta 1 in blood (mechanisms explained below) [20, 22]. At onset of lymphopenia due to other causes (not RT),
compensatory increase in IL7 and IL15 has been shown in various studies which
in turn leads to increased lymphocyte count. In patients receiving radiotherapy
or chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT) developing lymphopenia, studies have resulted in
conflicting results. In a study by Ellsworth et al.
[23]. patients with high-grade glioma treated with
concurrent chemo-radiotherapy showed lymphocyte depletion, but no increase in
IL-7 levels. Contrary to this, a study by Byun et al on hepatocellular
carcinoma patients receiving radiotherapy, compensatory rise of IL7 at onset of
severe lymphopenia was documented. [24]. Interestingly, murine studies have
also shown that lympho-depletion
due to radiotherapy alone is not associated with a compensatory increase in the homeostatic T cell cytokines Interleukin-7 and
Interleukin-15. Murine studies
have also suggested that use of IL15 super-agonist could possible alleviate RIL
and survival [21]. The above human
studies had the confounding of chemotherapy (Ellsworth et al) and absence of
utilization of any dose constraints to mitigate lymphopenia. In the absence of
clear data, it is imperative to perform a prospective study using LymphoTEC
dose constraints and correlate with cytokine levels.
Studies have also shown that hypo-fractionated radiotherapy and SBRT
have led to less incidence of RIL [25, 26].
However, as ultra-hypofractionation is not technically feasible due to risk of
toxicity in subsites like head and neck, CNS and abdomen, it is necessary that
evaluation of role of cytokines in RIL with conventional or moderate
hypofractionation (Dose per fraction < 3 Gy) be made as these fractionations
are expected to be used more commonly in combination with immunotherapy in
future.
Due to the above factors, we attempt to perform a study of cytokine
levels and correlation with lymphopenia while utilizing the proposed LymphoTEC
guidelines. If cytokines IL7, IL15 and
TGFBeta1 independently predict acute lymphopenia and there is absence of
compensatory rise in cytokine levels after RT, it paves way for future drug
trials with cytokine super agonist before or during RT, particularly when
planned with immunotherapy. As dose constraints alone failed to mitigate
lymphopenia in LymphoTEC GU study (MPMMCC
Study ID: 11000598), it is possible that multifactorial
intervention i.e. cytokine super-agonist along with dose constraints may help
alleviate RIL.
IL
7 and lymphocyte homeostasis:
T-cell homeostasis in the peripheral lymphoid
compartment is rigorously regulated through turnover, survival, and death. IL-7
promotes T-cell survival by upregulating the expression level of the Bcl-2
family of molecules, especially Mcl-1 (Anti-apoptotic) and Bcl-2, which can
extensively inhibit the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [27]. In addition to
dependence on a dynamic balance of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic signals,
IL-7 also affects glucose metabolism which is also critical for T-cell
survival. Research has also shown that expression of IL-7 and CCL19 significantly
improves T-cell infiltration and survival of CAR-T cells in mouse tumors,
enhancing the anti-tumor activity against solid tumors [28]. The data cited
indicates that IL 7 levels appear critical to maintain T cell levels. However,
if downstream pathways like BcL 2 molecules are impaired, levels of IL 7 may
not correlate with lymphopenia. In other words, if downstream effector
molecules/ pathways are deranged with radiotherapy, a compensatory rise in IL 7
may not correlate with increased lymphocyte levels. Such a finding should
stimulate further lab research in that direction.
IL
15 and lymphocyte homeostasis:
IL-15 promotes lymphocyte cell survival during
lymphopenia through JAK/STAT and PI3K/AKT pathway-mediated regulation of both
anti- and pro-apoptotic factors of the Bcl-2 protein family. In addition to
regulation by Bcl2 family proteins, IL-15 could regulate homeostatic cell
survival by modulating several ER stress response proteins through an unknown
mechanism, thus inhibiting survival defects induced by intense ER stress and
PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) expression [29, 30]. The data cited
indicates that IL 15 levels appear critical to maintain T cell levels. However,
if downstream pathways like BcL 2 molecules or PKR-like ER kinase
(PERK) expression are impaired, levels of IL 15 may not
correlate with lymphopenia. In other words, if downstream effector molecules/
pathways are deranged with radiotherapy, a compensatory rise in IL 15 may not
correlate with increased lymphocyte levels. Such a finding should stimulate
further lab research in that direction.
TGF
beta and lymphocyte homeostasis:
TGF-β1 primarily helps in maintaining immune
homeostasis and prevention of autoimmunity. Naive T cells released from thymus must
interact with self-MHC to survive in the periphery. Self-activation is normally
inhibited because [Ca2+]i levels are
not sufficient for synergy with costimulatory pathways. TGF-β1-deficient T
cells have spontaneously high [Ca2+]i levels, which alters the threshold level for
activation upon TCR/MHC interaction. Upon self-Ag recognition they become
activated, cause an autoimmune-type inflammatory response [31, 32]. TGF Beta
therefor normally prevents auto-immunity. But in cancer, recognition of Tumor
associated antigens (TAAs) is essential. Elevated TGF beta levels may lead to T
cells not getting activated even if no lymphopenia is present. This in turn may
prevent recognition of Tumor associated antigens (TAAs) and therefore poorer cancer
control. The present study will look to document TGF beta levels at start of RT
and look to correlate with initial lymphocyte counts. To decipher complete role
of TGF beta further lab studies must be planned in future |