| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/04/084049 [Registered on: 03/04/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
02/04/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Dentistry |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparing diffrent types of tooth fillings for cavities in childrens black teeth: A research study |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparative Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Modified, Glass Hybrid and Conventional GIC in Class II Restorations of Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Study |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Mayuri Sopan Mundhe |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
King Georges Medical University |
| Address |
Department add paediatric and preventive dentistry New dental building KGMU Lucknow
Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH 226003 India |
| Phone |
9049314952 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr.mayuri75@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Rajeev Kumar Singh |
| Designation |
Professor & HOD |
| Affiliation |
King Georges Medical University |
| Address |
Department add paediatric and preventive dentistry New dental building KGMU Lucknow
Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH 226003 India |
| Phone |
9450849528 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
rajeevkumarsingh@kgmcindia.edu |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Mayuri Sopan Mundhe |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
King Georges Medical University |
| Address |
Department add paediatric and preventive dentistry New dental building KGMU Lucknow
Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH 226003 India |
| Phone |
9049314952 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr.mayuri75@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| No material/monetary support |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Self sponsored |
| Address |
Department of paediatric and preventive dentistry KGMU, Lucknow |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Mayuri Sopan Mundhe |
Faculty of dental sciences, KGMU |
Department of paediatric and preventive dentistry KGMU Lucknow Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH |
9049314952
dr.mayuri75@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| King Georges Medical University U.P., Institutional Ethical Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
WITH OCCLUSOPROXIMAL CARIES IN PRIMARY MOLARS |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K02||Dental caries, (2) ICD-10 Condition: K02||Dental caries, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
ACTIVA BIOACTIVE |
ACTIVA BioACTIVE is an innovative dental restorative material developed by Pulpdent Corporation, combining the advantages of resin composites and glass ionomer cements. It is a bioactive material that releases and recharges essential minerals like fluoride, calcium, and phosphate, promoting remineralization and enhancing the longevity of restorations. The material features a moisture-friendly, rubberized-resin matrix that provides durability, shock absorption, and resistance to fracture. It chemically bonds to tooth structure, reducing microleakage and minimizing the risk of secondary caries. Free from Bisphenol A, Bis-GMA, and BPA derivatives, ACTIVA BioACTIVE is a safer alternative for restorative procedures, particularly in pediatric and preventive dentistry. It is available in different formulations, including ACTIVA BioACTIVE-Restorative and ACTIVA BioACTIVE-Base/Liner, making it a versatile choice for various clinical applications. |
| Comparator Agent |
Conventional GIC(GC Fuji IX GP (Type 9 GIC) |
GC Fuji IX GP (Type 9 GIC) is a high-strength, self-cured glass ionomer cement (GIC) developed by GC Corporation for posterior restorations, core build-ups, and bases under composite restorations. It features strong adhesion to dentin and enamel without the need for etching or bonding agents, ensuring an efficient and reliable seal. With its high fluoride release, it promotes remineralization and provides long-term caries prevention. The material exhibits enhanced wear resistance and improved fracture toughness compared to conventional GICs, making it suitable for high-stress areas such as class I and class II restorations in primary teeth and non-load-bearing restorations in permanent teeth. Its fast setting time, ease of handling, and excellent biocompatibility make GC Fuji IX GP a preferred choice in pediatric and geriatric dentistry. |
| Intervention |
Equia forte |
EQUIA Forte is an advanced glass hybrid restorative system developed by GC Corporation, combining the benefits of glass ionomer cement (GIC) and resin composite technology. It consists of EQUIA Forte Fil, a reinforced glass hybrid restorative, and EQUIA Forte Coat, a light-cured, highly filled resin coat that enhances durability and wear resistance. This system provides excellent fluoride release, chemical adhesion to the tooth structure, and superior marginal sealing, reducing the risk of microleakage and secondary caries. EQUIA Forte is particularly effective for posterior restorations, non-load-bearing class II cavities, and geriatric and pediatric cases due to its bulk-filling capability, high strength, and moisture tolerance. Its ease of application and long-term clinical performance make it a reliable alternative to conventional GICs and composites. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
4.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
7.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Occluso-proximal cavities in the primary maxillary and mandibular molars, International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS II) codes 4 and 5
2. Asymptomatic, vital teeth without pulpal involvement.
3. Patient without systemic diseases that may interfere with dental treatment.
4. Teeth without any developmental defects such as hypomineralisation, hypoplasia, and fluorosis.
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Primary molars with extensive loss of tooth structure that exceeds the suitability
for a Class II restoration.
2. Teeth with periodontal or periapical pathology.
3. Patients with a history of adverse reactions to restorative dental materials.
4. Severe developmental or cognitive impairment that interferes with cooperation during dental procedure.
5. Inability of the patient to comply with the follow-up examinations and the requirements of the study. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Assess the clinical efficacy of ACTIVA BioACTIVE, Equia forte(glass hybrid) and conventional GIC in restoring class II carious lesions in primary molars. |
1,6 and 12 months |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To compare three materials in terms of Esthetic, Biological and Functional properties. |
1, 6 and 12 months |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="105" Sample Size from India="105"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
23/04/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
IntroductionDental materials for Class II restorations in primary molars play a critical role in pediatric dentistry. This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of three restorative materials: ACTIVA BioACTIVE, EQUIA Forte, and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The evaluation focuses on factors such as retention, marginal integrity, and post-operative sensitivity. Materials and MethodsThe study enrolled pediatric patients requiring Class II restorations on primary molars. The materials used were: ACTIVA BioACTIVE: A bioactive composite resin known for releasing and recharging fluoride and enhancing tooth structure. EQUIA Forte: A glass hybrid restorative system with high wear resistance and fluoride release. Conventional GIC: A traditional restorative material with chemical adhesion and fluoride-releasing properties.
Restorations were placed following standardized protocols. Clinical assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Parameters evaluated included retention, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, and post-operative sensitivity. DiscussionThe study highlights that ACTIVA BioACTIVE and EQUIA Forte outperform Conventional GIC in retention, marginal adaptation, and surface smoothness. ACTIVA BioACTIVE’s bioactive properties contribute to enhanced tooth remineralization and stress absorption, while EQUIA Forte’s glass hybrid technology offers superior mechanical strength and fluoride release. Conventional GIC, despite its fluoride-releasing ability, displayed inferior performance due to its lower mechanical strength and increased surface roughness, which can lead to plaque retention and secondary caries. ConclusionACTIVA BioACTIVE emerged as the most effective material for Class II restorations in primary molars, followed closely by EQUIA Forte. Conventional GIC, while still a viable option, showed limitations in long-term durability and surface smoothness. These findings support the use of bioactive and hybrid materials for improved clinical outcomes in pediatric restorative dentistry. |