FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2024/10/075633 [Registered on: 22/10/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 09/05/2026
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   A Study To Compare The Outcomes Between The Conventional And Modified Epigastric Port Insertion Techniques In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy  
Scientific Title of Study   A Randomized Controlled Trial To Compare The Outcomes Between The Conventional And Modified Epigastric Port Insertion Techniques In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy  
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Arunkumar V 
Designation  Senior resident 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 
Address  Department of General Surgery, Level 6, Medical college building, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh. Dehradun UTTARANCHAL 249203 India

Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL
249203
India 
Phone  8884842973  
Fax    
Email  velarun95@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Amit gupta 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 
Address  Department of General Surgery, Level 6, Medical college building, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh. Dehradun UTTARANCHAL 249203 India

Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL
249203
India 
Phone  9891981331  
Fax    
Email  dramit2411@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Arunkumar V 
Designation  Senior resident 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 
Address  Department of General Surgery, Level 6, Medical college building, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh. Dehradun UTTARANCHAL 249203 India

Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL
249203
India 
Phone  8884842973  
Fax    
Email  velarun95@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh,Uttrakhand,India,249203 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh 
Address  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttrakhand, India,249203 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Arunkumar V  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh  C block,Level 5,division 531, IPD,Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh Dehradun UTTARANCHAL
Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL 
8884842973

velarun95@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
All India Institute of Medical sciences,Rishikesh, Instituitional Ethics committee  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Conventional epigastric port insertion  In conventional group, after making skin incision 2 cm below the below the xiphoid, abdomen will be entered on right side of falciform ligament. 
Intervention  Modified Epigastric port insertion  Epigastric port in this group, will be inserted under direct vision through the linea alba after making skin incision 2 finger breadth below the xiphoid. After entering the abdomen falciform ligament is pierced from left to right and port will be positioned towards gallbladder 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  All patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the age group of 18 years and above.
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1)Suspected malignancy
2)Pregnant patient
3)Frozen calots with or without surrounding dense adhesions
4)Patients who require CBD exploration
5)Cases that get converted to open
6)Patients with portal hypertension
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Investigator Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare the postoperative epigastric port site pain using VAS score between the conventional and modified epigastric port insertion techniques in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

 
6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours
 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare the time taken for extraction of gall bladder between the
modified epigastric port insertion group and conventional epigastric port
group in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 
Intraoperative
 
To compare the total duration of surgery between the modified epigastric
port insertion group and the conventional epigastric port group in
laparoscopic cholecystectomy 
Intraoperative 
To compare the 30 day epigastric wound complication rate using
Southampton scale between both the groups. 
Postoperative day 30 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="104"
Sample Size from India="104" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "0"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="0" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/11/2024 
Date of Study Completion (India) Date Missing 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most frequently done abdominal surgeries and is the standard of care for symptomatic cholelithiasis. LC is associated with good surgical results, insignificant blood loss, reduced severity of postoperative pain, and early discharge. Port site pain depends on the type and the method of trocar insertion as well as the nociceptive impulse can be from both the skin incision and the muscle damage and intramuscular hematoma that can occur during the port insertion. One of the important aspects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the proper port position in relation to the target organ of dissection. Although there is no controversy about the position of umbilical, right  subcostal (midclavicular) and right anterior axillary ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but there is no uniform consensus about the position of epigastric port. Conventionally epigastric port is inserted to the right of falciform ligament. In literature, position to the left of ligament is also mentioned. As in the modified technique of epigastric port insertion the port is inserted directly under vision through the linea alba instead of the muscle fibres there is less expected chances of muscle injury and intramuscular bleed. Lack of literature comparing both the above-mentioned techniques of epigastric port insertion especially with respect to the epigastric port site pain.The purpose of this study is to define the optimal epigastric port position for laparoscopic cholecystectomy by comparing the outcomes between conventional and modified epigastric port insertion techniques in laparoscopic cholecystectomy  with respect to parameters like postoperative pain, total requirement of postoperative analgesia, gallbladder retrieval time, total duration of surgery and port site infection (SSI). 
Close