| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/09/074240 [Registered on: 24/09/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
23/09/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) |
| Study Design |
Non-randomized, Multiple Arm Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparing Graston Technique and Positional Release Technique: Effects on Pain, Function, and Pressure Threshold in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparative Effects of Graston
Technique Vs Positional Release Technique on Pain, Function and Pain Pressure
Threshold in Patients with Chronic Plantar Fasciitis- an Experimental Study |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Patel Hetvi Janakbhai |
| Designation |
Post Graduate student |
| Affiliation |
SPB physiotherapy college |
| Address |
OPD no. 1 and 4, Dept. of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, SPB Physiotherapy college, Ugat, Bhesan, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Surat GUJARAT 395005 India |
| Phone |
9879863323 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
patelhetvi0407@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Dharti Pansala |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
SPB Physiotherapy college |
| Address |
OPD no. 1 and 4, Dept. of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, SPB Physiotherapy college, Ugat, Bhesan, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Surat GUJARAT 395005 India |
| Phone |
8141570075 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
physiodharti@yahoo.co.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Dharti Pansala |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
SPB Physiotherapy college |
| Address |
OPD no. 1 and 4, Dept. of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, SPB Physiotherapy college, Ugat, Bhesan, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Surat GUJARAT 395005 India |
| Phone |
8141570075 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
physiodharti@yahoo.co.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| SPB Physiotherapy college, Ugat- Bhesan road, Morabhagal, Rander, Surat, Gujarat, India,395005 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
SPB Physiotherapy college |
| Address |
Ugat- Bhesan road, Morabhagal, Rander, Surat, Gujarat, India,395005 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Patel Hetvi Janakbhai |
SPB Physiotherapy college |
OPD 1 and 4, Department of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, Ugat-Bhesan road, Morabhagal, Rander, Surat, Gujarat, India- 395005 Surat GUJARAT |
9879863323
patelhetvi0407@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethical Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: M959||Acquired deformity of musculoskeletal system, unspecified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Conventional Physiotherapy for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis |
Towel curl up- 10 times with 5 second hold
Active ankle movements (ankle dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion and eversion)- 10 times in supine lying position
Plantar fascia self-stretch 3 times with a 30 second hold
Gastrocnemius muscle stretch- 3 times with a 30 second hold
Soleus muscle stretch- 3 times with a 30 second hold |
| Intervention |
Graston technique |
The patient lies in prone with knees bent slightly. GT cream is applied on the plantar surface of the heel and mid-foot. GT treatment (using the sweep technique) is to be given with the Graston tools. To and fro stroking with tolerable force from the medial side of the heel to the metatarsals and from the metatarsals to the medial side of the heel is to be applied for approximately 8 minutes with 60 to 70 strokes/minute with a 5 to 10 second rest interval in between and at a 60° angle on the sole of the foot. Aggressive treatment should be applied with increased force on the area where tissue restriction felt high. At the end of treatment, a cold pack should be applied for 5 minutes. |
| Intervention |
Positional Release Technique |
Patient is placed in prone lying position with the knee flexed to approximately 90° and foot resting on the left hand of the therapist who is standing by the side of the patient. The patient is then asked to dorsiflex the foot so as to accentuate the fibers of the plantar aponeurosis for palpation. The therapist uses her right hand to glide across the aponeurosis with firm pressure from its distal insertions to its proximal origin at the medial calcaneus. The location of any tender points particularly at its origin at the calcaneus is to be noted. Once the most dominant tender point is determined, the therapist sits on the couch and places the toes of the patient in the sulcus of his left shoulder to promote phalangeal flexion. The ankle of the patient is then moved into marked plantarflexion with the left hand of the therapist. The therapist then uses her right hand to apply a light pressure with the pads of the fingers at the location of any trigger point and maintains the pressure until there is reduction in pain or held 2 minutes. Fine tuning involving calcaneal internal or external rotation by the therapist’s left hand based on the location of the pain is applied to maintain the position of most ease (position of less sensitivity). 3 repetitions of this position should be held with rest interval. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
25.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
50.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients who are ready to give consent and willing to participate in the study if they meet the following criteria.
Patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis by clinical criteria.
Age group between 25 to 50 years.
Both male and female.
Duration of symptoms more than 6 weeks.
Tenderness of Grade I and II present on palpation on medial calcaneum.
Maximum heel pain with the 1st step in the morning or after prolonged immobilization.
Patient who is able to read and write in English or Gujarati language.
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
History of fracture, trauma or surgery in the foot or ankle before 6 months.
Congenital or acquired structural foot deformity like pes planus, pes cavus etc.
Subjects who had taken corticosteroid injection in heel before 6 months.
Subjects who are on NSAIDs.
Diabetic foot, open wound or burns.
Heel fat pad syndrome and/or Baxter nerve entrapment.
Subjects using modified footwear.
Subjects diagnosed with any infective condition of foot or any neurological, cardio-pulmonary, psychosomatic disorder.
Tumour or malignancy.
Pregnancy
Calcaneal spur on X-ray.
Subject undergoing any other treatment for the same condition from any other health practitioner.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Pain by NPRS
2. Function by Foot Function Index (FFI)
3. Pain pressure threshold by digital algometer
|
At baseline and 4th week |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="30" Sample Size from India="30"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
04/10/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Comparative Effects of Graston Technique Vs Positional Release Technique on Pain, Function and Pain Pressure Threshold in Patients with Chronic Plantar Fasciitis- an Experimental Study
1.1 Need of the study The main purpose of this study is to find out which technique from Graston, positional release technique and conventional therapy gives more effective results on pain, function and pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.
1.2 Objective of the study 1. To evaluate the effect of Graston technique (GT) on pain, function and pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. 2. To evaluate the effect of Positional Release Technique (PRT) on pain, function and pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. 3. To compare the effect of Graston technique (GT) versus Positional Release technique (PRT) on pain, function and pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.
1.3 Methodology: 1. Study design: a pre-post experimental study 2. Study population: Patients with plantar fasciitis. 3. Study sample: Patients of both genders between the age 25-50 years with chronic plantar fasciitis. 4. Sampling technique: Purposive sampling.
1.4 Inclusion criteria: Patients who are ready to give consent and willing to participate in the study if they meet the following criteria Patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis by clinical criteria. Age group between 25-50 years. Both male and female. Duration of symptoms more than 6 weeks. Tenderness of Grade I and II present on palpation on medial calcaneum. Maximum heel pain with the 1st step in the morning or after prolonged immobilization. Patient who is able to read and write in English or Gujarati language.
1.5 Exclusion criteria: History of fracture, trauma or surgery in the foot or ankle before 6 months. Congenital or acquired structural foot deformity like pes planus, pes cavus etc. Subjects who had taken corticosteroid injection in heel before 6 months. Subjects who are on NSAIDs. Diabetic foot, open wound or burns. Heel fat pad syndrome and/or Baxter nerve entrapment. Subjects using modified footwear. Subjects diagnosed with any infective condition of foot or any neurological, cardio-pulmonary, psychosomatic disorder. Tumour or malignancy. Pregnancy Calcaneal spur on X-ray. Subject undergoing any other treatment for the same condition from any other health practitioner.
1.6 Procedure: The participants will be screened on basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study. Their demographic data will be obtained. Assessment of all the outcome measures will be done. The participants will be allocated randomly into 3 groups by Computer Generated Random Numbers.
Group A: Graston technique + Conventional treatment (experimental group) Group B: Positional Release technique + Conventional treatment (experimental group) Group C: Conventional treatment (control group) Total treatment will be 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks. On the first day of the first week, baseline measurements of pain, function and pain pressure threshold will be taken. Total treatment will be of 4 weeks with 3 sessions per week (alternate day session). Post assessment data of pain, function and pain pressure threshold will be taken at the end of 4 weeks.
|