| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/07/090569 [Registered on: 09/07/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
08/07/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Dentistry |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THERMOFORMED AND DIRECTLY PRINTED ALIGNER MATERIALS |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THERMOFORMED AND DIRECTLY PRINTED ALIGNER MATERIALS: AN IN VIVO STUDY |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Divya Lohia |
| Designation |
PG student, orthodontics |
| Affiliation |
Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research |
| Address |
Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research sec 89 Faridabad
Faridabad HARYANA 121002 India |
| Phone |
9958894688 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
divyalohia1806@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Gurkeerat Singh |
| Designation |
Head Professor, orthodontics |
| Affiliation |
Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research |
| Address |
Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research sec 89 Faridabad
Faridabad HARYANA 121002 India |
| Phone |
9811063930 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drgurkeeratsingh@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Gurkeerat Singh |
| Designation |
Head Professor, orthodontics |
| Affiliation |
Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research |
| Address |
Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research sec 89 Faridabad
Faridabad HARYANA 121002 India |
| Phone |
9811063930 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drgurkeeratsingh@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Divya Lohia |
| Address |
Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research Institute |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Divya Lohia |
Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research |
Department of Orthodontics, room number 4, sector 89
121002
Faridabad
HARYANA Faridabad HARYANA |
09958894688
divyalohia1806@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| SRCDSR Institutional Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
Mild to moderate dental crowding |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
aligner |
changes in mechanical properties of two different aligner materials at 0 day, 7 day and 14 day |
| Comparator Agent |
aligner |
mechanical properties of aligner material PETG and 3D printed aligner material |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
30.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Patient with good oral hygiene
2.Patient with mild to moderate malocclusion.
3.Patient with good compliance to wear aligners
4.Patient should wear atleast 20-22 hours per day |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Patient with poor oral hygiene.
2.Patient with a habit of smoking, tobacco chewing or bruxism.
3.Any other food habit which could alter the aligner material properties.
4.Distorted aligners.
•Patient with Esophageal reflux as it may affect the property of the material.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Other |
|
Method of Concealment
|
An Open list of random numbers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| mechanical properties of aligners |
4 weeks |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| to determine which material is best for aligner fabrication |
8 weeks |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="16" Sample Size from India="16"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
28/07/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="2" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This in vivo study aims to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of
two orthodontic aligner materials thermoformed and directly printed. With
increasing demand for aesthetic orthodontic options clear aligners have become
widely used. However conventional thermoformed aligners often show limitations
such as low strength and dimensional instability. Directly printed aligners
using advanced biocompatible materials like TC85DAC offer a potential
improvement in these properties. The study involves sixteen patients divided
into two groups each receiving one type of aligner. Mechanical properties such
as tensile strength flexural strength and surface hardness are assessed at the
beginning of treatment and after 14 days of intraoral use. Data is analyzed statistically
to determine significant differences. The study has received ethical clearance
and informed consent is obtained from all participants. Results are awaited and
the findings are expected to guide material selection for improved clinical
outcomes in aligner therapy. |