| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/09/074305 [Registered on: 25/09/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
23/09/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of two techniques for cannulation of radial artery using ultrasound. Ultrasound probe perpendicular to artery(short axis-angle distance) approach versus parallel to artery (long axis in-plane)approach: A Randomized Control Trial |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of short axis-angle distance approach versus long axis in-plane approach of ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr. Rishi Sharma |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delh |
| Address |
Room Number 5011, 5th Floor.
Academic Block.
Department Of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care.
Academic Block.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
City- New Delhi.
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
7317686155 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
rshsharma90@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr. Chhavi Sawhney |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
Room Number 125, 1st Floor.
Jai Prakash Narayan Trauma Centre.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9818357051 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drchhavisawhney@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr. Chhavi Sawhney |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
Room Number 125, 1st Floor.
Jai Prakash Narayan Trauma Centre.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi.
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9818357051 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drchhavisawhney@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi.
City- New Delhi.
Country- India.
PinCode-110029. |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi |
| Address |
Room Number- 5011, 5th Floor.
Office- Department Of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
City- New Delhi.
Country- India.
PinCode-110029 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Chhavi Sawhney |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
Room Number 5011, 5th Floor.
Academic Block.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. South DELHI |
9818357051
drchhavisawhney@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| INSTITUTE ETHICS COMMITTEE FOR POST GRADUATE RESEARCH, ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NEW DELHI |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Ultrasound guided long axis-in plane technique(LA-IP) |
n SA-AD group, a Sonosite M Turbo ultrasound machine with a linear USG probe of 8-13 MHz with small footprint will be used(Sonosite Inc, Bothell, WA,USA). The probe is placed to view the short-axis plane of the target artery and moved to place the artery in the center of the ultrasound screen. Then the probe is rotated by 90 degrees to bring the probe in the longitudinal axis of the artery. The needle is inserted and the catheter advanced under ultrasound view guidance |
| Intervention |
Ultrasound guided short axis- angle distance technique(SA-AD) |
In SA-AD group, a Sonosite M
Turbo ultrasound machine with
a linear USG probe of 8-13 MHz
with small footprint will be used(Sonosite Inc, Bothell, WA,USA). The probe is placed to view the short-axis plane of the target artery and moved to place the artery in the center of the ultrasound screen. Then the distance from the surface of the skin to the anterior wall of the artery is measured. Angle of 45 degrees between the needle and skin is used for puncture and the distance between the point of insertion and the central point of the probe will approximately equal to the distance from the surface of the skin to the anterior wall of the artery. Then the needle is advanced until the blood appears in the hub. The needle angle is decreased slightly while the catheter was advanced slightly. The catheter is advanced into the target artery only if blood continued to flow into the hub. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
99.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
ASA 1,2 or 3 patients posted for elective or emergency surgeries requiring radial artery cannulation. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Patient refusal
Abnormal Modified Allen test
BMI more than 30kg per cm2
Local infection at site of cannulation
Patients with any other contraindication for radial artery cannulation |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
First attempt success rate of ultrasound
guided radial artery cannulation using short axis-angle distance technique vs long axis in plane technique. |
At Baseline. |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Overall success rate
2. Total number of attempts
3. Time required for successful cannulation
4. Incidence of posterior wall puncture
5.Incidence of complications |
Approximately 15 minutes after the induction of anesthesia |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="72" Sample Size from India="72"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
05/10/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Arterial cannulation is a frequently performed procedure in patients with anticipated massive blood loss, significant hemodynamic changes or requirement of frequent blood gas sampling in perioperative period. Various arteries are being used for cannulation like radial, ulnar, femoral and dorsalis pedis. The radial artery cannulation can be done by visualizing the artery in oblique axis, long axis and transverse axis via ultrasound. Each technique has different degree of success rate. However, the optimal USG guided technique is still controversial as the results are variable. Till now there are various studies done regarding long axis approach for USG guided radial artery cannulation. There is another variation of short-axis angle distance technique which has been compared with DNTP technique. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that
compared short axis- angle distance with long axis technique. So, we want to compare short axis-angle distance approach with long axis-in plane approach. |