NEED FOR THE STUDY
Stroke
patients generally have impairments such as motor, sensory, emotional, and
cognitive dysfunction as well as functional restrictions. As a result of
stroke, muscle tension increases abnormally, resulting abnormality in upper and
lower limb that makes it difficult to perform walking ability in day to day
life. Difficulty in walking appears in 20% of stroke survivors and mainly
impairs balance and gait. Around
the globe, Stroke prevalence among the elderly in rural India was 1.1% and
urban India was 1.9%. Current literature has shown that gait and balance
impairment is one of the most common problems in Stroke patients. There are
very few literatures available on conservative management to improve gait and
balance in stroke patients. The Electrical Muscle Stimulation combined with
treadmill training gives better effect in stroke patients. Hence the need of my
study is Effectiveness of Electrical muscle stimulation combined with treadmill
training on gait and balance improvement in stroke patients.
.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Will there any
Effect of Electrical muscle stimulation combined with treadmill training on
gait and balance improvement in stroke patients?
AIM
AND OBJECTIVES
Aim:
Ø To study the effect of Electrical muscle
stimulation combined with treadmill training on gait and balance improvement in
stroke patients.
Objectives:
Ø To study the effect of Electrical muscle
stimulation combined with Treadmill on gait improvement in stroke patients by
Dynamic gait index, Functional Ambulation Category, time up and go and gait assessment.
Ø To study the effect of Electrical muscle
stimulation combined with Treadmill training on balance improvement in stroke
patients by Berg balance scale.
Hypotheses
Null Hypothesis (H0):
There will be no significant
effect
of Electrical muscle stimulation combined with treadmill training on gait
improvement in stroke patients.
Alternative
Hypothesis (H1):
There will be significant effect
of Electrical muscle stimulation combined with treadmill training on gait
improvement in stroke patients. METHODOLOGY 7.1 Source of Data: Pravara Rural Hospital, Loni. Study Setting: The study
will be conducted at department of Neuro-Physiotherapy, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam College of
Physiotherapy, PIMS, Loni 7.2
Method of collection of data: Data
will be collected by primary investigator Type of
Data: Quantitative
Study
Design:
Randomized Controlled Trial Sample
size: Participants: Patients with stroke Sampling
Method: Simple Random Sampling Study Duration: 2 years Material to be used: Ø Data Record Sheet Ø Assessment sheet Ø Consent Form Ø Pen Ø Electrical Muscle Stimulation Ø Treadmill Ø Measuring tap SELECTION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria: Participants included
will be: Ø
Patients with 30–65 years of age Ø
Male and female can equally participate Ø
Subject diagnosed as stroke. Ø
Ability to walk without any support for at least
10 m Ø
Ambulation ability ≥3 based on functional
ambulation classification Ø
Patients with unilateral Hemiplegia Ø
Participants willing to participate Exclusion criteria: Participants excluded
will be: Ø
Unconscious patients Ø
Patients with psychiatric disorder Ø
Patients with recurrent stroke Ø
Patients with metabolic disorder Ø
contractures of the lower extremities Ø
metallic implants in the legs OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures used for this study will be as follows,
|
Variable
|
Method of Measurement
|
Statistical Scale
|
Descriptive Statistics
|
|
Age
|
Interview
|
Nominal scale
|
Mean ± SD Proportion
|
|
Gender
|
Observation
|
Nominal scale
|
Mean ± SD Proportion
|
|
Gait
|
Ø Dynamic gait index,
Ø Functional
Ambulation Category,
Ø Time Up and Go and
Ø Gait assessment.
|
Ordinal scale
|
Mean ± SD Proportion
|
|
Balance
|
Ø
Berg
balance scale
|
Ordinal scale
|
Mean ± SD Proportion
|
1. Dynamic gait index: The DGI tests the ability of the participant to maintain
walking balance while responding to different task demands, through
various dynamic conditions. It is a useful test in individuals
with vestibular and balance problems and those at risk of falls. It
includes eight items, walking on level surfaces, changing speeds, head turns in
horizontal and vertical directions, walking and turning 180 degrees to stop,
stepping over and around obstacles, and stair ascent and descent. Each item is
scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 indicating normal performance and 0
representing severe impairment. The best possible score on the DGI is a 24 2. Functional Ambulation Category : The Functional
Ambulation Categories (FAC) is a 6-point functional walking test that evaluates
ambulation ability, determining how much human support the patient requires
when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device The FAC is a quick visual measurement of walking, is
simple to use, easy to interpret, and cost-effective because only stairs and
15m of indoor floor are needed to administer the test Scoring of
FAC is 0-Nonfunctional
ambulato,1-Ambulator, dependent on physical assistance – level I,2-Ambulator,
dependent on physical assistance – level II,3-Ambulator, dependent on
supervision,4-Ambulator, independent level surface only,5-Ambulator, independent 3.Timed Up and Go: The
reliability of the TUG (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.98),
DGI (ICC2,1 = 0.98) and BBS (ICC2,1 = 0.99) were
excellent. The standard error of measurement (SEM) of the TUG, DGI, and BBS
were 1.16, 0.71, and 0.98, respectively. The minimal detectable change (MDC) of
the TUG, DGI, and BBS were 3.2, 1.9, and 2.7, respectively. There was a
significant correlation found between the DGI and BBS (first reading
[r] = 0.75; second reading [r] = 0.77), TUG and BBS (first reading [r] = −.52;
second reading [r] = −.53), and the TUG and DGI (first reading [r] = 0.45;
second reading [r] = 0.48), respectively. 4. Gait assessment: In gait assessment there are some parameters are
taken Stride- The sequence of events between successive heel strike of the same
foot, Step- The sequence of event between successive heel strikes of the
opposite feet, Stride length- distance between two successive heel strikes of
the same foot (144cm or 57 inches), Step length- distance between heel strike
of two different feet (72cm or 8 inches),
Step width- lateral distance between heel centers of two consecutive
foot contact (8 to 12 cm or 3 to 4 inches), Cadence- Number of steps per minute
(90 to 120 steps/ min), Stride time-
time for full gait cycle, Step time- Time for completion of heel strike of
right foot to heel strike of left foot. 5. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is
used to objectively determine a patient’s ability (or inability) to
safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14
item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from
0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level
of function and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. It is use for
elderly population with balance impairments, patients with acute stroke. PROCEDURE ·
Protocol
will be prepared and ethical clearance will be obtained from the IEC. ·
The
Participants will be selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for
eligibility. ·
Informed
consent will be obtained from the participants and demographic data is
recorded. · 41 Participants will be randomly allocated to
2 groups that is experimental group(n=21) and control group(n=20). Prior assessment of the participants
will be done. ·
Experimental
group will be administered with Electrical muscle stimulation combined with
treadmill training for stroke patients and control group will be administered
with conventional exercise program for Stroke patients. ·
All the
instructions will be given verbally, provided demonstration to the
participants. ·
The
participants will be given exercise regimen and administered to perform one
session per day for 4 days in a week for 6 weeks. ·
The variables
like Dynamic gait index, Functional ambulatory category, up and go test, gait
assessment and berg balance scale will be measured accordingly. ·
Statistical
analysis will be done and the results with the conclusion will be mentioned.
|