FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2024/03/064734 [Registered on: 26/03/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 01/07/2024
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Medical Device 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of seizure generating versus non-seizure generating electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for treating depression 
Scientific Title of Study   A proof-of-concept study to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of convulsive versus sub-convulsive stimuli of modified electroconvulsive therapy 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Rohit Verma 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  Room No. 4096, 4th Floor, Teaching Block
AIIMS, Ansari Nagar
South
DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  09868005491  
Fax    
Email  rohit.aiims@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Rohit Verma 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  Room No. 4096, 4th Floor, Teaching Block
AIIMS, Ansari Nagar

DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  09868005491  
Fax    
Email  rohit.aiims@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Rohit Verma 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  Room No. 4096, 4th Floor, Teaching Block
AIIMS, Ansari Nagar

DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  09868005491  
Fax    
Email  rohit.aiims@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi  
Address  Ansari Nagar New Delhi 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
D Rohit Verma  All India Institute of Medical Science New Delhi  Room No. 4096, 4th Floor, Teaching Block Department of Psychiatry, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar New Delhi
South
DELHI 
09868005491

rohit.aiims@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institute Ethics Committee AIIMS New Delhi   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: F322||Major depressive disorder, singleepisode, severe without psychotic features,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Standard Convulsive mECT Stimulation protocol  The stimulus intensity will be determined by a dose titration procedure (starting at 25.2mC) and seizure threshold will be identified in the first session. Then, electrical dose will be determined by multiplying seizure threshold dose by 6 times in the following 8 sessions. If seizure duration is less than 20s for motor or less than 25s for EEG (aborted seizure), electrical dose would be increased as per the standard stimulation protocol followed in the MECT facility. Three sessions per week would be provided keeping the total study time as 3 weeks (consisting of 8 sessions). 
Intervention  Sub-convulsive mECT Stimulation protocol  The stimulus intensity will be determined by a dose titration procedure (starting at 25.2mC) and seizure threshold will be identified in the first session. Then stimulus dosages in subsequent 8 sessions will be kept below the seizure threshold. Three sessions per week would be provided keeping the total study time as 3 weeks (consisting of 8 sessions). 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1.Age 18-60 years
2.Willing to give informed consent
3.Ability to read Hindi or English language
4.Fulfilling criteria of major depressive disorder as per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th version (DSM 5) in group 1 & 2
5.Treatment resistance will be defined as the failure to respond to 2 adequate trials of different classes of antidepressant medications (Sackeim, 2001)
6.Patients referred for ECT (for all study patients, a clinical decision to pursue neuromodulation would have already been made. Clinical treatment will be performed independently of this study).
7.No changes in psychiatric medications for at least one month prior to study and willingness to not change during study 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1.Patients with chronic neurological or other physical illness (like coronary artery disease or cardiac arrhythmia)
2.Suffering from any other psychiatric disorder other than major depressive disorder in their respective groups
3.Persistent mood disorders (dysthymia) and other and unspecified depressions based on DSM 5
4.History of significant head trauma
5.Patients with ongoing alcohol or other substance abuse or dependence (except nicotine and caffeine)
6.Any history of seizure
7.Previous history of receiving any surgical procedures or electrical or magnetic stimulation on brain
8.Known or suspected pregnancy or lactating females
9.History of serious, potentially life-threatening reaction to anesthesia or succinylcholine 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Case Record Numbers 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Investigator Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Significant improvement in depressive symptoms defined as more than 50 percent reduction in baseline HAMD scores will be the primary clinical outcome  At baseline before first mECT session and at 3rd week after 8 mECT sessions 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Changes in activation & connectivity seen on fNIRS & qEEG during resting state as well as activation state (in response to emotional tasks) scans & changes in BDNF levels will be correlated to clinical changes of scores  At baseline before first mECT session & at 3rd week after 8 mECT sessions 
Side effects in both groups will be assessed to compare the tolerability of the procedure  At baseline before first mECT session & at 3rd week after 8 mECT sessions 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="10"
Sample Size from India="10" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 3/ Phase 4 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/04/2024 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Open to Recruitment 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

ECT is a neuromodulation-based treatment approach for mental ailment that elicits dramatic clinical improvement. It was developed on the premise that Epilepsy and Psychosis were alternating and individuals exhibited opposite features while one of the symptoms dominated. Thus, it was thought that seizures were essential to curb symptoms of psychosis. However, the effectiveness of ECT has not been conclusively linked with presence of convulsions. Rather even the duration of seizure after ECT has not been associated with the clinical response. On the other hand, animal studies have shown that electrical brain stimulation can induce antidepressant-like effects without inducing seizures. In human beings, historical evidence does suggest that reports from the 1940s and 1950s that "sub-convulsive" and "non-convulsive" electrotherapies were effective for some patients without adverse cognitive effects. Moreover, the recent neuromodulation techniques like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) does not induce seizures and still have been shown to be effective in improving symptoms of mental disorders particularly depression. And there is even report that sub-convulsive electrical stimulation while determining seizure threshold during a course of ECT does not have acute effects on cognition. There are different explanations for the effectiveness of sub-convulsive stimulus of ECT but there are limited studies of it in humans. The studies on response of patients to sub-convulsive stimulus are also lacking. Since the cognitive side effects are also less with sub-convulsive ECT, which is a major drawback for usual ECT, our aim is to study the response of sub-convulsive stimulus of ECT in individuals with treatment resistant depression (TRD).

Studies on functional neuroimaging show that treatment is capable of normalizing brain activations in patients. But these studies are conducted majorly using fMRI or PET techniques. The heavy cost and time consumption of these techniques make them user unfriendly. Newer technique as fNIRS scan can perform the similar task of evaluating cortical hemodynamic activation pattern with ease of use. Studies on electrical cortical activities using qEEG have generated a plethora of data reporting abnormalities in patients and have been associated to treatment response. Studies have also suggested that BDNF might be a potential biomarker for mental illnesses representing neuronal integrity. There are studies suggesting potential role of BDNF as biomarker in ECT.

Significant changes in serum BDNF levels, cerebral Hb changes and event related potentials over time after receiving ECT will shed light over the potential mechanisms of treatment effectiveness in this illness. The correlation analysis to illness severity scale scores will reflect their association with treatment response pattern. It can pave way towards elaboration of the understanding by which such techniques generate effects in patients with TRD. This would increase the effectiveness of the treatment program as biomarkers can serve as objective indicators of health status. The difference in these parameters among the individuals with depressive disorder will further strengthen the association of the biomarkers (singularly or in combination) to a specific disorder

 
Close