FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/06/088526 [Registered on: 10/06/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 08/06/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Multiple Arm Trial 
Public Title of Study   A THREE-GROUP RANDOMISED STUDY COMPARING: INJECTING ICG DYE INTO A VEIN, INSTILLING ICG DYE INTO THE GALLBLADDER, AND WITHOUT USING ICG DYE — COMPARING WHICH IS BETTER IN IDENTIFYING IMPORTANT STRUCTURES DURING MINIMALLY INVASIVE GALLBLADDER REMOVAL SURGERY 
Scientific Title of Study   THREE ARM RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING INTRAVENOUS INDOCYANINE GREEN, INTRA GALL BLADDER INDOCYANINE GREEN AND NO INDOCYANINE GREEN DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACHIEVING CRITICAL VIEW OF SAFETY 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Asuri Krishna 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  All india institute of medical sciences, New delhi 
Address  Room no-406 4th Floor Surgery Block Aiims New Delhi Pin-110049 South West DELHI 110049 India New Delhi DELHI 110049 India

South West
DELHI
-110049
India 
Phone  9051742097  
Fax    
Email  dr.asurikrishna@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Asuri Krishna 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  All india institute of medical sciences, New delhi 
Address  Room no-406 4th Floor Surgery Block Aiims New Delhi Pin-110049 South West DELHI 110049 India New Delhi DELHI 110049 India

South West
DELHI
-110049
India 
Phone  9051742097  
Fax    
Email  dr.asurikrishna@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Nipun Chandra 
Designation  MS General Surgery 
Affiliation  All india institute of medical sciences, New delhi 
Address  Room no-406 4th Floor Surgery Block Aiims New Delhi Pin-110049 South West DELHI 110049 India New Delhi DELHI 110049 India

South West
DELHI
110049
India 
Phone  9937157927  
Fax    
Email  nipunchandra217@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
AIIMS New Delhi 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Asuri Krishna 
Address  Room no - 406, 4th floor Surgery block AIIMS New Delhi Pin - 110049  
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Asuri Krishna  AIIMS New Delhi  Room 406 4th floor Surgery Block AIIMS New Delhi Pin 110049
South West
DELHI 
9999405767

drasurikirshna@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institute of ethics committee AIIMS ot block Ansari Nagar New Delhi 29  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: K800||Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis, (2) ICD-10 Condition: K801||Calculus of gallbladder with othercholecystitis, (3) ICD-10 Condition: K802||Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Convetional laparoscopic assisted cholecystectomy  Under GA, patient in reverse trendelenberg position with right side up , under all aseptic precautions parts painted and draped. Pneumoperitoneum created using open method via Supraumbilical incision and 12 mm port inserted. Other Standard ports placed under vision. Intraoperative finding noted . Calots identified and omental adhesions released . Calots dissection done to achieve Critical view of safety. Cystic artery and duct clipped with green hem o lock and golden hem o lock respectively and divided. Gall bladder dissected off its bed. Specimen retrieved through epigastric port. Warm saline wash given. Hemostasis ensured. Pneumodesufflated. Ports removed under vision. Supraumbilical port closed with port vicryl. Skin closure done with Nylon 3-0. Aseptic Dressing done.  
Intervention  Laparoscopic assisted cholecystectomy with intra gall bladder ICG  Under GA, patient in reverse trendelenberg position with right side up , under all aseptic precautions parts painted and draped. Pneumoperitoneum created using open method via Supraumbilical incision and 12 mm port inserted. Other Standard ports placed under vision. Intra gall bladder ICG given. Intraoperative finding noted . Calots identified and omental adhesions released . Calots dissection done to achieve Critical view of safety. Cystic artery and duct clipped with green hem o lock and golden hem o lock respectively and divided. Gall bladder dissected off its bed. Specimen retrieved through epigastric port. Warm saline wash given. Hemostasis ensured. Pneumodesufflated. Ports removed under vision. Supraumbilical port closed with port vicryl. Skin closure done with Nylon 3-0. Aseptic Dressing done. 
Intervention  Laparoscopic assisted cholecystectomy with intravenous ICG  Under GA, patient in reverse trendelenberg position with right side up , under all aseptic precautions parts painted and draped. 1 ml of ICG(2.5mg/ml) will be injected intravenously. Pneumoperitoneum created using open method via Supraumbilical incision and 12 mm port inserted. Other Standard ports placed under vision. Intraoperative finding noted . Calots identified and omental adhesions released . Calots dissection done to achieve Critical view of safety. Cystic artery and duct clipped with green hem o lock and golden hem o lock respectively and divided. Gall bladder dissected off its bed. Specimen retrieved through epigastric port. Warm saline wash given. Hemostasis ensured. Pneumodesufflated. Ports removed under vision. Supraumbilical port closed with port vicryl. Skin closure done with Nylon 3-0. Aseptic Dressing done. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Adult patients with Ultrasound whole abdomen proved Gall stone disease who are hemodynamically stable
and fit for General anaesthesia in whom Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is indicated either interval or immediate( within
72 hrs of presentation). 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patients who are planned for simultaneous common bile duct (CBD) exploration or have undergone previous failed Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
or have allergy to Indocyanine green (ICG) 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Stratified block randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Operative time from insertion of ports to achieving critical view of safety.  Operative time from insertion of ports to achieving critical view of safety. 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Blood loss  Intraoperatively 
Conversion to Subtotal cholecystectomy  Intraoperatively 
Conversion to open cholecystectomy  Intraoperatively 
Bile duct injury  Intraoperatively and in postoperative hospital stay 
Post operative bile leak  Postoperative hospital stay 
Hospital stay  Hospital stay 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="102"
Sample Size from India="102" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 2/ Phase 3 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   19/06/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="2"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Yet Recruiting 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has long been the first-line therapy for cholecystitis. Various studies have clarified the predictive factors for surgical difficulties and indications for conversion to laparotomy during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for cholecystitis. These indications include iatrogenic bile duct injury , severe fibrosis, and scarring in Calot’s triangle area or the gallbladder bed due to inflammation and bleeding. The critical view of safety technique is the standard approach to avoid iatrogenic Bile duct injury in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 
Intraoperative fluorescence imaging with Indo Cyanine Green(ICG) was recently shown to be an alternative to intraoperative cholangiography for visualizing the extrahepatic biliary structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Bile duct injury is the most feared complication during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Real-time intraoperative imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) will reduce the risk of bile duct injury by improving visualization of the biliary tree during laparoscopy. This effect will also shorten operative time, reducing the dangers of prolonged operation time

The primary objective of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of operative time taken from insertion of ports to achieving critical view of safety (CVS) in conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intravenous ICG for intraoperative fluorescence imaging and intra gall baldder ICG for intraoperative fluoresence imaging. Other parameters to be compared are intraoperative blood loss, coversion to open cholecystectomy, conversion to sub total cholecystectomy, bile duct injury, post operative bile leak and hospital stay.


Previous randomised controlled trials comparing comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intravenous/intra gall bladder ICG have shown shorter operative time and reduced intraoperative blood loss. But previous trials have limited comparative data of the three groups compared together and the difference in postoperative hospital morbidity.

The purpose of the present study is to compare the operative time taken from insertion of ports to achieving critical view of safety between the three groups- conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intravenous ICG and laparoscopic cholecystecomy with intra gall bladder ICG
 
Close