FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2024/05/067564 [Registered on: 17/05/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 16/05/2024
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   A comparison of intravenous anaesthesia with gas based anaesthetic with respect to reliability of monitoring of spinal cord function during spine surgery. 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of TIVA with Propofol versus Sevoflurane and Dexmedetomidine on reliability of intra-operative MEP monitoring in spine surgical patients having pre-operative paresis. 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Mathew George 
Designation  Associate Professor and Senior Consultant 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Amrita hospital Ponekkara Road, P.O, Edapally Kochi, Ernakulam Kerala-682041

Ernakulam
KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  9447841795  
Fax    
Email  mathew.doc@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Mathew George 
Designation  Associate Professor and Senior Consultant 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  Division of Orthiopaedic and Neuroanaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesia, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Amrita hospital Ponekkara Road, P.O, Edapally Kochi, Ernakulam Kerala-682041

Ernakulam
KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  9447841795  
Fax    
Email  mathew.doc@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Shyama C Shyam Sunder  
Designation  Post-Graduate Resident 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Amrita hospital Ponekkara Road, P.O, Edapally Kochi, Ernakulam Kerala-682041

Ernakulam
KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  9566094316  
Fax    
Email  shyamasmail@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Mathew George 
Address  Associate professor-Anaesthesia Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Amrita hospital Ponekkara road P.O, Edappally Kochi, Ernakulam Kerala-682041 
Type of Sponsor  Other [self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Mathew George  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences   3-1 Operation theatres, Orthiopaedic and Neurosurgical Departments, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Ponekkara Road P.O Edapally, Kochi Ernakulam 682041
Ernakulam
KERALA 
9447841795

mathew.doc@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
The Institutional Ethics Committee-Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Using Dexmedetomidine-Sevoflurane combination anaesthetic during spine surgeries  Patient will be given anaesthesia with Dexmedetomidine-Sevoflurane. During critical junctures of surgery, spinal cord integrity will be assessed by motor evoked potential monitoring, and the values of the potentials will be recorded, and any muscles where potential is unrecordable will be noted. Study begins with induction of anaesthesia and will conclude with the patient recovering from the anaesthetic and neurological status is confirmed postoperatively. 
Intervention  Using Total Intravenous Anaesthesia with Propofol during spine surgeries   Patient will be given anaesthesia with Propofol based TIVA. During critical junctures of surgery, spinal cord integrity will be assessed by motor evoked potential monitoring, and the values of the potentials will be recorded, and any muscles where potential is unrecordable will be noted. Study begins with the induction of anaesthesia and will conclude with the patient recovering from the anaesthetic and neurological status is confirmed postoperatively. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Patients posted for spine surgeries who have pre-operative motor power of Grade 3-4 attributable to the surgical issue that is being addressed 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patients with extensive flaccid paralysis below the level of surgery.

Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the drugs included in the protocol. 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   An Open list of random numbers 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Outcome is based on the intra-operative reliability of measured potentials calculated on basis of ratio of the number of muscles with reliable potentials to the number of muscles monitored.
 
Measurements will be taken 30 minutes after the induction of anaesthesia and during critical junctures of surgery. Study ends after recovery from anaesthesia and neurological assessment is completed. 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare intra-operative reliability of motor evoked potentials with respect to incidence of fresh post-op neurological deficits  Post-operative assessment of fresh neurological deficits will be done after reversal of anaesthesia & patient has awoken. Following neurological assessment the secondary outcome will also have been completed 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="34"
Sample Size from India="34" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/06/2024 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

Patients  are  allocated  the  study  group based  on  a  computer generated random number sequence. Patients in Group D will receive    dexmedetomidine    and    inhaled    sevoflurane    for anaesthetic maintenance, while group P will receive Propofolinfusion for maintenance of anaesthesia.


The patients will be maintained NPO (nil per orally) for 6 hours (solids) and 2 hours (clear fluids) prior to surgery. On reaching the operating room, patients in Group D will be induced with fentanyl 2 μg.kg-1, a sleep dose of propofol intravenously and muscle relaxation achieved with atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1. Patients in group P will receive fentanyl 2 μg.kg-1, propofol to achieve plasma level of 3 μg.ml-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1. The patient will be intubated and positive pressure ventilation maintained with oxygen-air mixture at a fresh gas floe of 1 litre per minute in a closed circuit to maintain normocapnia. Fentanyl infusion will be initiated for all patients at a dose of 1μg.kg-1.hour-1, which may be increased up to 3 μg.kg-1.hour-1 based on the managing anaesthetist’s judgement of the patients’ analgesic requirements.

Vitals monitoring will include invasive blood pressure, electrocardiogram, heart rate, oropharyngeal temperature, urine output and end tidal carbon dioxide concentration in all the patients. Use of a forced air warmer and maintaining the room temperature at 20°C, will aid in reducing the extent of patient hypothermia. All patients will have a BIS electrode placed for assessment of anaesthetic depth and to facilitate titration of anaesthetics. 


Patientsin group D will receive a dexmedetomidine bolus of 0.5 μg.kg-1over 10 minutes followed by an infusion of 0.5   μg.kg-1.hr-1which will becombined with inhaled sevoflurane titrated to maintain an end-tidal concentration of 0.5 MAC.   Anaestheticdepth will be titrated with the sevoflurane to ensure that the BIS value stays below 60 and above 40.

Patients in Group P will be maintained on a propofol infusion based on the Eleveld-2.1 PKPD model targeting an effect site plasma concentration of 3 μg.ml-1. Anaesthetic depth will be adjusted    by    increasing    or    decreasing    the    effect    site concentration of propofol by 0.5 μg.ml-1, in order to maintain the BIS below 60 and above 40.

Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring with trans- cranial  electrical  stimulation  of motor cortex with  electrodes C3,  C4  placed  according  to  the  international   10-20  EEG system.  Stimulus will be applied at a  strength  of 300-500V, with  train  stimulus  reserved  for  inability  to  elicit  evoked potentials with a single twitch.

Muscle relaxants will not be use intraoperatively during tcMEP recording  and  subsidence  of  action  of  atracurium  will  be ascertained by ensuring all four twitches on train-of-four, with absence of fade. For the purpose of our comparison, we will record the amplitude of cMAPs recorded from the all groups ofmuscles  of the  patients  (side  with  the  higher  amplitude  in baseline recording will be taken). cMAP baseline  amplitude will be noted before the commencement of surgery and at time of dural opening / beginning of procedure.

Variables noted will include: 

  1. Reliability of the MEP recorded- proportion of muscles with recordable cMAPs to the total number of muscles monitored. We defined reliability of the MEP as a proportion of the muscles from which a measurable MEP signal / cMAP was achieved, to the total number of muscles for which measuring electrodes were placed, expressed as a percentage.

  2. Number of stimuli required to elicit recordable cMAP. 

  3. Increase in stimulus strength (voltage). 

  4. Episodes of MEP suppression- global or focal. 


Any patient in whom the baseline MEP amplitude is less than 50 V after reasonable escalation of stimulation strength and frequency will be considered to have absent evoked potential. The anaesthetic team will then have the option to cross-over the anaesthetic technique to the alternative group and attempt to record the MEP. 


 
Close