| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/12/078358 [Registered on: 20/12/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
19/12/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Diagnostic |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A randomized controlled trial of low dose computed tomography versus ultra-low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A randomized controlled trial of low-dose computed tomography versus ultra-low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals. |
| Trial Acronym |
nil |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Vikram Damaraju |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, India |
| Address |
Old TB sanatorium Road, Mangalagiri, 522503, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh
Guntur ANDHRA PRADESH 522503 India |
| Phone |
9501482884 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
damarajuvikram@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Vikram Damaraju |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, India |
| Address |
Old TB sanatorium Road, Mangalagiri, 522503, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh
ANDHRA PRADESH 522503 India |
| Phone |
9501482884 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
damarajuvikram@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Vikram Damaraju |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, India |
| Address |
Old TB sanatorium Road, Mangalagiri, 522503, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh
ANDHRA PRADESH 522503 India |
| Phone |
9501482884 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
damarajuvikram@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| The funding is through an Intramural grant from All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Guntur, 522503, Andhra Pradesh, India. |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
AIIMS Mangalagiri |
| Address |
Old TB sanatorium road, Mangalagiri, Guntur, 522503, Andhra Pradesh, India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Vikram Damaraju |
AIIMS Mangalagiri |
Room no 412, 4th floor, OPD Block, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Old TB Sanatorium Road, Mangalagiri, Guntur, 522503, Andhra Pradesh. Guntur ANDHRA PRADESH |
9501482884
damarajuvikram@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethical Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: J439||Emphysema, unspecified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
low dose computed tomography |
3-5 mSv, 100-120 kVp, 40-60 mAs. Each scan will be performed once at baseline in the recruited participants.Depending on the scan result, participant may undergo a repeat scan at 3 months or 6 months. If the baseline scan is negative, no further scan will be performed. |
| Intervention |
Ultra low dose computed tomography |
1 mSv, 20-40 mAs, 60-80 kVp. Each scan will be performed once at baseline in the recruited participants. Depending on the scan result, participant may undergo a repeat scan at 3 months or 6 months. If the baseline scan is negative, no further scan will be performed. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
50.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Individuals aged ≥50 years with ≥20 pack-year history of smoking (or smoking index ≥400) |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Symptomatic structural lung disease other than COPD (e.g., bronchiectasis, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, pulmonary fibrosis)
2. Severe comorbid condition which is likely to limit the survival of the patient in the opinion of the investigator (e.g., advanced lung disease, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease)
3. Clinical suspicion of lung cancer (e.g., symptoms [hemoptysis, hoarseness, chest pain], signs [clubbing, lymphadenopathy], or abnormal chest radiograph [mediastinal widening, lung nodule or mass, collapse, or pleural effusion] suggestive of malignancy).
4. Conditions which may interfere interpretation of CT (e.g., metallic implants on chest wall, cardiac pacemakers)
5. Treatment for any other cancer in the last 5 years
6. Pulmonary infection (for which treatment with antimicrobials is indicated) which is active at present or was recent (within the last 3 months)
7. Patients who have underwent CT chest within the last 12 months
8. Negative consent
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Investigator Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Screen positivity rate with LDCT and ULDCT screening |
18 months from the start of trial |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Mean radiation dose with LDCT and ULDCT
2. Lung cancer detection rate with LDCT and ULDCT
3. Proportion of patients requiring additional procedures (imaging/invasive procedures) in both groups
4. Proportion of patients developing complications due to additional procedures in both groups
5. Proportion of patients who quit/re-initiated smoking after inclusion in study |
18 months from the start of trial |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="164" Sample Size from India="164"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/01/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. LC is associated with a poor 5-year survival rate, especially when diagnosed at an advanced stage. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the thorax reduces lung cancer-specific mortality by 20-25%. Despite endorsement by several organizations, LCS is not routinely performed in many developing countries for various clinical and operational reasons. However, emerging evidence indicates that false positive results with LDCT in developing countries may not be as unacceptably high as previously believed. Concurrently, advances in technology have led to the development of ultra-low dose computed tomography (ULDCT) with improved image quality and diagnostic accuracy even with radiation doses of less than 1mSv (sub millisievert dose). Several observational studies noted comparable diagnostic sensitivity of ULDCT and LDCT. LCS by ULDCT seems to be a feasible approach, however, the lack of randomised trials restricts its wider use. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that ULDCT is non-inferior to LDCT in detecting lung cancer, concurrently with significantly reduced radiation dose. Novelty: A randomized study on ULDCT versus LDCT is not available to date in the literature, and only one study of LDCT for LCS is done in India. So, we intend to do a randomized controlled trial of LDCT versus ULDCT for LCS in high-risk individuals and assess whether ULDCT (with lower radiation dose) is non-inferior to LDCT or not. Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of LDCT and ULDCT for LCS in high risk individuals. Primary 1. Screen positivity rate with LDCT and ULDCT screening Secondary 1. Mean radiation dose with LDCT and ULDCT 2. Lung cancer detection rate with LDCT and ULDCT 3. Proportion of patients requiring additional procedures (imaging/invasive procedures) in both groups 4. Proportion of patients developing complications due to additional procedures in both groups 5. Proportion of patients who quit/re-initiated smoking after inclusion in study Methods: This will be a randomized, parallel group, double blinded, non-inferior study conducted in the out-patient department of Pulmonary Medicine, AIIMS, Mangalagiri. High risk individuals for lung cancer (aged ³50 years with ³20 pack-year history of smoking [or smoking index ≥400]) will be included in the study. Individuals with a clinical suspicion of lung cancer, structural lung disease other than COPD, severe comorbidities limiting survival, recent pulmonary infection in the last 3 months, recent CT thorax in one year, treatment for any cancer in last 5 years will be excluded. Individuals will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to undergo either LDCT or ULDCT. Evaluation and follow-up of positive nodules detected on LDCT/ULDCT will be performed as per standard protocols consistent with the NCCN 2023 guidelines for LCS. The outcomes from this study will provide additional data to the previous observational study from India and can serve as a benchmark for policy makers and program managers in the context of feasibility and yield of LCS using LDCT or ULDCT in developing countries like India. |