INTRODUCTION
Childhood
is crucial for developing physical, cognitive, and social skills. However,
sedentary behaviour and lack of physical activity (PA) amongst children
is an important issue that needs to be addressed [1]. Children’s lifestyles are
becoming increasingly sedentary, with a growing trend of spending long hours
sitting in front of screens and engaging in minimal physical activity [1].
As defined by the World Health Organization (2020), sedentary behaviour
is defined as any waking behaviour characterized by an energy expenditure of
1.5 METS (metabolic equivalents; multiples of basal metabolic rates) or lower
while sitting, reclining, or lying, while physical activity is defined as any
bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure [21].
One of the significant causes of sedentary behaviour and lack of
physical activity among
children are the increasing reliance on technology and screens [13].
With the proliferation of smartphones, tablets, and other electronic devices,
children spend more time sitting in front of screens than engaging in physical
activities [13]. This trend is compounded by the fact that many schools need
more facilities or programs for physical education, making it difficult for
children to get the exercise they need [1,2].
Physical inactivity has been linked to noncommunicable
disease and economic burden globally, and poses significant challenges in
rapidly growing countries including India, which is currently home to the
second largest population in the world [5].
Physical inactivity is a
modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a widening variety of
other chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus, cancer (colon and breast),
obesity, hypertension, bone and joint diseases (osteoporosis and
osteoarthritis), and depression [5].
A
growing number of studies report that regular physical activity (PA) during
childhood is associated with physical, mental, emotional and social health
benefits [8]. Physical activity plays a protective role against
excessive body fat mass and positively correlates with health indicators such
as health status, self-image, quality of life and family and peer relationship,
as well as healthy child development [5].
Physical
fitness refers to a physiologic state of well-being that allows one to meet the
demands of daily living or that provides the basis for sport performance, or
both [1]. Health-related physical fitness involves the components of physical
fitness related to health status, including cardiovascular fitness, musculoskeletal
fitness, body composition and metabolism [1,2]. In large epidemiologic
investigations, physical activity and physical fitness are often used
interchangeably, with fitness commonly being treated as a more accurate measure
of physical activity than self-report [8].
Considering that children spend many hours at school,
the classroom is the ideal setting to promote children’s PA, since it gives
access to children regardless of age, ethnicity, gender and socio-economic
status [5]. Previous systematic reviews showed that classroom-based PA had a
positive impact on physical activity level, classroom behaviour, cognitive
functions and academic achievement [1]. Several mechanisms might explain the
effects of PA on cognitive functions and academic performance [5]. First, acute
PA causes the release of neurotransmitters, which increase physiological
arousal and attention levels, consequently enhancing the cognitive performance
[5]. Secondly, continuous aerobic physical activity is thought to enhance the
angiogenesis and neurogenesis in areas of the brain involved in memory and
learning functions. The improvements regarding executive functions and
attention may, in turn, improve the academic performance of preadolescent
children [5,8].
In order to avoid the risk of metabolic and
cardiovascular dis-eases, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that children
and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years should accumulate at least 60 min per day of
MVPA [2]. Despite this, global estimates indicate that low percentages of
children and adolescents comply with WHO recommendations [2]. NEED
FOR THE STUDY It is important to
perform physical activities or exercises to improve likelihood of healthy
lifestyle. Participating in Physical Activity has shown to have mental,
emotional, physical benefits as well as improve academic performance. School students
in India, students in secondary school i.e. between 5th to 10th
standards, face challenges like academic pressures, mental health concerns,
adapting to new technology-driven learning methods, due to which they are stuck
to their chairs or seats for prolonged durations leading to risks of back pain,
eye strain from excessive screen time and disrupted sleep due to irregular
sleeping and eating schedules. Poor nutrition and lack of exercises can
contribute to health challenges. Additionally, the constant use of screen can
lead to posture and eyesight problems. Insufficient physical activity can lead
to weight-related issues and reduced cardiovascular health, which in turn can
lead to chronic conditions in longer run. Physical Education (PE) in school
plays vital role in developing a child, thus promoting overall health and
well-being. However, schools these days want their children to be in front in
all academic aspects, except sports. The time given to the PE classes is
limited and there are many instances where these classes are replaced by other
subjects. These situations lead to lack of importance given to physical health
and aversion of students to liking any sports. Also, PE teaches essential
skills like teamwork, discipline, and goal setting. However, lack of PE can
lead to health risks, decreased focus, and a missed opportunity to develop
crucial social and motor skills.
Thus, the overall impact
depends on quality and emphasis placed on PE within the Educational System. RESEARCH
QUESTION
What are the effects of
school-based exercise program on physical parameters amongst secondary school
children?
AIM
AND OBJECTIVES
AIM –
To study the effects of
school-based exercise program on physical parameters amongst secondary school
children.
OBJECTIVES –
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
1.
To design and validate School-Based Exercise
Protocol for secondary school students.
2.
To study the effect of school-based exercise
program on Physical Parameters i.e. Body Mass Index, Muscular Endurance and
Aerobic Capacity.
3.
To study the effect of Sedentary Lifestyle
in Secondary School Children.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
To correlate the effects
of school-based exercise program based on factors such as age, gender and
lifestyle patterns. HYPOTHESIS
Null Hypothesis (H0) –
There will not be any
significant effect of school-based exercise program on physical parameters and
lifestyle in secondary school children.
Alternative Hypothesis
(H1) –
There will be significant
effect of school-based exercise program on physical parameters and lifestyle in
secondary school children. MATERIALS
AND METHODOLOGY
Source of Data – Secondary
School in Loni.
Study Type –
Experimental Study.
Study Design – Randomised
controlled trial.
Study Setting – Secondary
School
in Loni.
Study Population – Secondary
School Children between 5th to 10th standards.
Study Duration – 2
years.
Sample Size – 60 Secondary School
Children.
(Calculated using winpepi software)
SELECTION CRITERIA
Inclusion Criteria
1.
Secondary School children between 5th
to 10th standards (around 10-15 years of age).
2.
Written and signed consent forms from
parents/guardians/teachers.
Exclusion Criteria
1.
Unwilling to participate.
2.
History of any Musculoskeletal Injury or
conditions over last 6 months. OUTCOME
MEASURES
The outcome measures used
in this study are as follows –
|
SR NO
|
Variable Name
|
Method of measurement
|
Statistical Scale
|
Descriptive Statistics
|
|
1
|
Aerobic Capacity
|
Shuttle Walk Test
|
Ordinal
|
Mean ± SD
Proportion
|
|
2
|
Muscular Endurance
|
Curl Up Test
|
Ordinal
|
Mean ± SD
Proportion
|
|
3
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
Test
|
Ordinal
|
Mean ± SD
Proportion
|
|
4
|
Rosenberg Sedentary Lifestyle Questionnaire
|
Interview
|
Ordinal
|
Mean ± SD
Proportion
|
|
5
|
Age
|
Interview
|
Nominal
|
Mean ± SD
Proportion
|
|
6
|
Gender
|
Interview
|
Nominal
|
Mean ± SD
Proportion
|
PROCEDURE
Phase 1-Ethical Clearance
The
synopsis will be submitted to the institutional ethical committee (IEC) and
permission will be obtained.
Phase 2-Enrollment of
Participants
On getting permission from IEC to carry out the study,
participants will be enrolled based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Informed content will be taken from guardians/teachers.
Phase 3-Data Collection
Participants will be
divided into 2 groups, i.e. Experimental Group (n=30) and Control Group (n=30).
Experimental group will
be administered with school-based exercise program, while control group will be
given conventional PE exercises conducted during their PE classes.
Intervention
Group A - Experimental Group:
All the instructions for
exercise program will be given verbally to the students and they will be
provided with demonstrations along with guidance throughout the program.
The students will be
given the exercise program and will have to perform those exercises within the
stipulated time of their PE class for 3 days in 6 weeks.
The 3 Physical Parameters
i.e. Aerobic Capacity, Muscular Endurance and Body Mass Index will be screened
Pre and Post the exercise program.
Statistical Analysis will
be done and result will be calculated.
REFERENCES 1.
Masini A,
Marini S, Gori D, Leoni E, Rochira A, Dallolio L. Evaluation of school-based
interventions of active breaks in primary schools: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Apr;23(4):377-384. doi:
10.1016/j.jsams.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 18. PMID: 31722840. 2.
Warburton
DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence.
CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351. PMID: 16534088;
PMCID: PMC1402378. 3.
Bhawra J,
Khadilkar A, Krishnaveni GV, Kumaran K, Katapally TR. The 2022 India Report
Card on physical activity for children and adolescents. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2023
Jan;21(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Oct 31. PMID:
36408207; PMCID: PMC9663889. 4.
Górnicka M,
Hamulka J, Wadolowska L, Kowalkowska J, Kostyra E, Tomaszewska M, Czeczelewski
J, Bronkowska M. Activity–inactivity patterns, screen time, and physical
activity: the association with overweight, central obesity and muscle strength
in Polish teenagers. Report from the ABC of healthy eating study. International
journal of environmental research and public health. 2020 Nov;17(21):7842. 5.
Vuori I.
Physical inactivity is a cause and physical activity is a remedy for major
public health problems. Kinesiology. 2004 Dec 23;36(2):123-53. 6.
Batistão
MV, Carnaz L, Moreira RD, Sato TD. Effects of a muscular stretching and
strengthening school-based exercise program on posture, trunk mobility, and
musculoskeletal pain among elementary schoolchildren-a randomized controlled
trial. Fisioterapia em Movimento. 2019 Feb 21;32.
Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Ganie MA, Kanwar R, Shivaprasad C, Sabharwal A,
Bhadra K, Narang A. Nationwide reference data for height, weight and body mass 1. index of Indian schoolchildren. Natl Med J
India. 2011 Sep-Oct;24(5):269-77. PMID: 22680077. Demetriou, Y.,
Reimers, A.K., Alesi, M. et al. Effects of school-based
interventions on motivation towards physical activity in children and
adolescents: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 8,
113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1029-1
3.
Khadilkar
VV, Khadilkar AV, Cole TJ, Chiplonkar SA, Pandit D. Overweight and obesity
prevalence and body mass index trends in Indian children. Int J Pediatr Obes.
2011 Jun;6(2-2): e216-24. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2010.541463. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
PMID: 21158695.
4.
Dos Santos
SF, Bordin D, de Souza EF, Júnior IF. Study protocol and baseline
characteristics of “SCHOOL IN ACTION†program on support to physical activity
and healthy lifestyles in adolescents. Contemporary Clinical Trials
Communications. 2020 Mar 1; 17:100505.
5.
Eime RM,
Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the
psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and
adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through
sport. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.
2013 Dec;10(1):1-21.
6.
Yuksel HS,
Åžahin FN, Maksimovic N, Drid P, Bianco A. School-Based Intervention Programs
for Preventing Obesity and Promoting Physical Activity and Fitness: A
Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 3;17(1):347. doi:
10.3390/ijerph17010347. PMID: 31947891; PMCID: PMC6981629.
Tambalis
KD, Panagiotakos DB, Psarra G, Sidossis LS. Screen time and its effect on
dietary habits and lifestyle among schoolchildren. Central European journal of
public health. 2020 Dec 1;28(4):260-6. 1.
A.Sangeetha, Kannan Dhasaradharaman,
Fredinand Robert, Kohilavani S,Sathyapriya, Keerthana Priya V, A Comparative
Study Between the Effect of Aerobic Exercise Versus Circuit Training on Obesity
Among School Going Students. International
Journal of Health Sciences and Research Vol.13; Issue: 6; June 2023 Original
Research Article ISSN: 2249-9571.
2. Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Lubans DR,
Henriksson P, Torres-Lopez LV, Rodriguez-Ayllon M, Plaza-Florido A, Gil-Cosano
JJ, Henriksson H, Escolano-Margarit MV, Gómez-Vida J. Effects of an exercise
program on cardiometabolic and mental health in children with overweight or
obesity: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network
Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2324839-.
3. Yamakita M, Ando D, Sugita H, Akiyama Y, Sato
M, Yokomichi H, Yamaguchi K, Yamagata Z. Koshu group activity, active play and
exercise (Grape) study: A cluster randomised controlled trial protocol of a
school-based intervention among Japanese children. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;18(7):3351.
4. Wright CM, Duquesnay PJ, Anzman-Frasca S,
Chomitz VR, Chui K, Economos CD, Langevin EG, Nelson ME, Sacheck JM. Study
protocol: the Fueling Learning through Exercise (FLEX) study–a randomized
controlled trial of the impact of school-based physical activity programs on
children’s physical activity, cognitive function, and academic achievement. BMC
public health. 2016 Dec;16(1):1-2.
5. Homeyer D, Memaran N, Kück M, Grams L, von der
Born J, Bauer E, Schwalba M, Kerling A, von Maltzahn N, Albrecht A, Haverich A.
Participating in a School-Integrated Daily Exercise Program Improves Motor
Performance Significantly in School-Children. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4764.
6. Armstrong N. Aerobic fitness and physical
activity in children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2013 Nov;25(4):548-60. doi:
10.1123/pes.25.4.548. PMID: 24214438. 1. Siedler M, Murad MH, Falck-Ytter Y, Dahm P,
Mustafa RA, Sultan S, Morgan RL. Guidelines about physical activity and
exercise to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors: protocol for a systematic
review and critical appraisal. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 23;10(1):e032656. doi:
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032656. PMID: 31980508; PMCID: PMC7044951.
2. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Prescription, 9th
Edition.
|