FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2024/06/068959 [Registered on: 14/06/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 14/06/2024
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of Levobupivacaine and fentanyl when given in fractionated dose versus when given sequentially for spinal anaesthesia  
Scientific Title of Study   Intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% in fractionated versus sequential dose spinal anaesthesia: Randomized controlled trial 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Neeharika Arora 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital 
Address  Room No 2062-D, Department of Anaesthesia, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Pilibhit bypass road, Bareilly

Bareilly
UTTAR PRADESH
243006
India 
Phone  8077104070  
Fax    
Email  docneehars@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Neeharika Arora 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital 
Address  Room No 2062-D, Department of Anaesthesia, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Pilibhit bypass road, Bareilly

Bareilly
UTTAR PRADESH
243006
India 
Phone  8077104070  
Fax    
Email  docneehars@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Rajat Kumar Agrawal 
Designation  Junior Resident 
Affiliation  Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital 
Address  Room No 2062-D, Department of Anaesthesia, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Pilibhit bypass road, Bareilly

Bareilly
UTTAR PRADESH
243006
India 
Phone  9098682222  
Fax    
Email  rajatagrawal143@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Pilibhit bypass road, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India Pin 243006 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital 
Address  Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Pilibhit bypass road, Bareilly 
Type of Sponsor  Private medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Neeharika Arora  Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital  Operation theater, Department of Anaesthesia, RMCH, Philibhit bypass road
Bareilly
UTTAR PRADESH 
8077104070

docneehars@gmail.coM 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional ethics committee, RMCH, Bareilly, U.P  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: PCS||, (2) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Fractionated dose spinal anaesthesia  Patients will be administered a fractionated dose of of 3ml - with 2/3rd I.e. 2ml of the total dose given initially, the syringe kept attached to the spinal needle for 45s after which remaining 1/3rd dose will be administered 
Comparator Agent  Sequential dose spinal anaesthesia  patients will be administered a sequential dose - 2.5 mL hyperbaric Levobupivacaine 0.5% followed by 25 mcg fentanyl, through a separate syringe, with less than 5 seconds between the change of syringes 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  70.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1. American society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grade I or II
2. Patient undergoing elective infra umbilical surgeries 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. Patient refusal for the procedure
2. Infection at the site
3. Any abnormality of spine
4. Allergy to local anaesthetics
5. Coagulopathy
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc 
Method of Concealment   Case Record Numbers 
Blinding/Masking   Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1. Onset of sensory & motor blockade
2. Highest level of sensory block
3. Time for two segment regression of sensory block
4. Duration of motor blockade
5. Time for first rescue analgesic
6. Incidence of post-operative nausea, vomiting and post spinal shivering.
 
Sensory block will be assessed after 1 minute of injection every 1min until the level is established for four consecutive tests, after that assessment will continue every 10 min until 2 segment regression occurs. The time for motor block from bromage 3 to bromage 2 will be considered as the duration of motor blockade.
 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Hemodynamic parameters (Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure)  During the surgery the patient’s heart rate, Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure, Mean Arterial Pressure, arterial oxygen saturation will be recorded every 5 mins for 30 minutes and then every 10 minutes until completion of the surgery. 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="70"
Sample Size from India="70" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 4 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/07/2024 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  
Spinal anesthesia has significantly evolved, offering various techniques and adjuvants to enhance efficacy and patient outcomes. Notably, the combination of intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric levobupivacaine is of great interest. This study compares the efficacy of this combination when administered through Sequential Spinal Anesthesia (SSA) and Fractionated Spinal Anesthesia (FSA).

Hyperbaric levobupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic with reduced cardiovascular toxicity, is favored in spinal anesthesia. When combined with fentanyl, known for its rapid onset and analgesic properties, it potentially enhances spinal anesthesia quality by providing optimal intraoperative conditions and extended postoperative analgesia.

FSA, an innovative technique to mitigate hypotension, administers the local anesthetic in fractions with short intervals, aiming for a more controlled block with fewer hemodynamic issues. However, concerns about complications like post-dural puncture headache and neurological deficits limit its use.

In contrast, SSA involves sequential administration of anesthesia components, each tailored to exploit specific benefits, offering an alternative to FSA’s challenges. The baricity of the fentanyl and hyperbaric levobupivacaine mixture can affect local anesthetic spread in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), impacting anesthesia efficacy.

Research indicates that mixing adjuvants with hyperbaric bupivacaine can alter CSF distribution, whereas administering them separately might avoid these changes, improving onset, duration, and hemodynamic stability.

The study evaluates FSA versus SSA by examining sensory and motor blockade onset and duration, intraoperative conditions, and hemodynamic stability. This research aims to fill gaps in existing literature and enhance spinal anesthesia practices, aiding practitioners in providing better patient care. 

This study seeks to critically examine and compare the efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% when administered through two different dosing strategies fractionated spinal anaesthesia and sequential spinal anaesthesia. Key parameters under scrutiny include the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative conditions, and hemodynamic stability. This research endeavours to contribute nuanced insights into refining spinal anesthesia administration techniques, ultimately aiming for enhanced patient safety, comfort, and positive perioperative experiences.

By shedding light on the comparative merits of Sequential and Fractionated Spinal Anesthesia, this investigation aspires to guide anaesthetic practitioners in making informed decisions, advancing the standards of spinal anesthesia practice for improved patient care.


 
Close