| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/07/071318 [Registered on: 25/07/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
25/07/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison 0f Effects of two different doses of oral drug tapentadol to prevent urinary catheter related urinary bladder discomfort in patients undergoing routine surgeries under general anaesthesia in Tertiary Hospital |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Effects Of Two Different Doses Of Pre-Emptive Oral Tapentadol for Attenuation Of Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort In Patient Undergoing Elective Surgeries under General Anaesthesia: A Double Blind Randomised Clinical Trial |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Arvind Kumar Saroj |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
|
| Address |
Room no 329 Department of Anaesthesiology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai
Etawah UTTAR PRADESH 206130 India |
| Phone |
7380636757 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr.aarya@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Amit Kumar Singh |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
Uttar pradesh university of medical sciences, saifai |
| Address |
Room no 329 Dept of Anaesthesiology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai
Etawah UTTAR PRADESH 206130 India |
| Phone |
7351768859 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dramit2212@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Amit Kumar Singh |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
Uttar pradesh university of medical sciences, saifai |
| Address |
Room no 329 Dept of Anaesthesiology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai
Etawah UTTAR PRADESH 206130 India |
| Phone |
7351768859 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dramit2212@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Science |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Science |
| Address |
Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Science Saifai Etawah |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Arvind Kumar Saroj |
Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Science |
Uttar Pradesh University Of Medical Science SAIFAI ETAWAH Etawah UTTAR PRADESH |
7380636757
dr.aarya@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Instituitional Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Tablet Tapentadol 50 mg |
Group B receive 50 mg oral Tapentadol , Patient scheduled for elective surgeries,inwhich urinary catheterisation is supposed to be maintained for more than 24 hours post surgeries by oral route with sips of water before the induction of anaesthesia |
| Intervention |
Tablet Tapentadol 75 mg |
Group A will receive oral tapentadol 75 mg , patients schedule for elective surgeries,inwhich urinary catheterisation is supposed to maintained for more than 24 hours post surgerery by Oral route, 1 hour before the induction of anaesthesia with sips of water |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Patiens between the ages of 18 to 60 years of either sex 2.Body mass index between 18.9 to 29.9 kg/m2 3.American Society of Anaesthesiologist Grade 1 and 2 3.Elective surgeries under General Anaesthesia requiring urinary catheterization for more than 24 hours. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Patient refusal 2.Known allegy to drug 3.Opioids tolerance/dependence 4.Renal/hepatic impairment 5.Known cardiovascular disease 6.known respiratory impairment like asthma 7.Intestinal obstruction 8.Pregnant and breastfeading woman 9.Urethral surgeries or pathology 10.Catheterisation done in more than 1 attempt or trauma caused during catheterisation |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Investigator Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE are
1.To compare the efficacy of two different doses of Tapentadol for attenuation of Catheter related bladder discomfort |
1 day |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES are
1.To compare surgical sress response
2.To study hemodynamic variable of patient
3.To compare post operative Nausea and Vomiting |
1 day |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="100" Sample Size from India="100"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2/ Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
05/08/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
INTRODUCTION Urinary bladder catheterization is a common practice in various urological surgeries. It can lead to catheter related bladder discomfort (CRBD) which is defined as a feeling of urgency to urinate, a sensation of burning and discomfort in suprapubic region postoperatively. CRBD is a common cause of post-operative distress, pain and can increase the risk for emergence agitation in early post-operative period in all surgeries with foley’s catheter in situ, mainly in urological interventions. CRBD resembles an overactive bladder. It involves involuntary contraction of bladder which is mediated by muscarinic receptors and is the main cause of CRBD. The agents with anti-muscarinic activity such as oxybutinin, butyl scopolamine and tolterodine form the first line of treatment. Drugs modulating pain pathway like tramadol, tapentadol, parecoxib, gabapentin, and pregabalin have also been found effective in the management of CRBD. Tapentadol is a novel opioid analgesic that acts centrally to attenuate pain. Previous studies have shown that tapentadol has dual mechanisms of action as a mu-opioid receptor agonist and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibition. Therefore, tapentadol provides a great advantage over classic opioids in pain management from nociceptive to neuropathic, Cumulative evidence from in vitro data suggests that tapentadol effect on norepinephrine re-uptake could be a new target that overcomes other classic opioids in chronic neuropathic pain. Compared to other opioids tapantadol has fewer side effects. Tapentadol is a new alternative to treat acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain. Along with CRBD, surgical stress response also encompasses a cascade of physiological changes, including inflammatory and hormonal responses, triggered by surgical trauma, potentially influencing the patient’s recovery trajectory. The stress that is caused during a surgical procedure causes disturbance in metabolic and physiologic levels of cortisol. Recognizing the importance of effective management for both CRBD and the surgical stress response, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two different doses of tapentadol, an analgesic. By investigating the impact of tapentadol on CRBD and the surgical stress response, we aim to contribute valuable insights that could enhance perioperative care strategies, improve patient outcomes, and refine our understanding of the pharmacological management of postoperative discomfort.
AIM OF STUDY To compare the efficacy of two different doses of tapentadol, for attenuation of catheter related bladder discomfort in patients undergoing elective surgeries.
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy of two different doses of tapentadol for attenuation of catheter related bladder discomfort. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES 1. To compare surgical stress response. 2. To study hemodynamic variable of patient. postoperative nausea and vomiting.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Patients between the ages of 18-60 years of either sex. Body mass index between 18.5 to 29.9kg/m2 ASA grade I and II Posted for elective surgery under General Anaesthesia requiring urinary catheterization for > 24 hrs. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Patient refusal Known allergy to the drug Opioid tolerance/dependence Renal/hepatic impairment Known respiratory impairment like asthma Patient with any neurological disorder Intestinal obstruction Pregnant woman and breastfeeding woman Failure to catheterize in a single attempt Patient with previous history of urethral surgery or known case of uretheral pathology.
METHODOLOGY This prospective, randomized, clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of two different doses of tapentadol (50 mg and 75 mg) in managing catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and mitigating surgical stress responses in patients undergoing surgical procedures.The study will adhere to ethical standards after obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board and Informed Written consent from patient. Patients scheduled for elective surgeries, in which urinary catheterization is supposed to be maintained for more than 24 hours post-surgery will be recruited based on the inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to one of the two groups: Group A and Group B. Group A(n=50) will receive oral tapentadol 75 mg and group B(n=50) will receive oral tapentadol 50 mg. Blinding will be ensured by using identical-looking medication packages. On the day of surgery, preoperative baseline assessments, including vital signs such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and SpO2 will be recorded. Eligible participants will receive their assigned medication, orally with sips of water, 1 hour before the induction of anesthesia. The included patients will be catheterized with Foley’s catheter after application of adequate amount of water-soluble jelly for lubrication to avoid any uretheral trauma. The balloon will we inflated for 10 ml Normal Saline. Postoperatively, patients will be monitored for CRBD. The severity of CRBD will be evaluated by a blinded assessor at intervals of 0 hour., 0.5 hour, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 24 hour post-operatively, Grade 1 – no pain, Grade 2 – mild pain (revealed by asking the patient), Grade 3- moderate pain (spontaneous complaint by patient), Grade 4- severe discomfort (agitation, loud complaints and attempt to remove catheter. Hemodynamic variables such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and SpO2 will be recorded at 0-hour, 0.5 hour, 1hr, 2hrs, 3hrs, 4hrs, 5hrs, and 6hrs and over 24 hours post-surgery Sample for serum cortisol level will be sent 2 hours before surgery and 2 hours after completion of surgery. Postoperative pain will be assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) score, which varied from 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Data will be collected at 0-hour, 0.5 hour, 1hour, 2hour, 3hour, 4hour, 5hour, and 6hours and over 24 hours post-surgery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting will be assessed as a score of 0,1 or 2 (0= no nausea or vomiting, 1= tolerable nausea and vomiting and 2= intractable nausea and vomiting). Statistical Analysis - It will be done using Microsoft Excel and SSPS version 29 IBM Inc. Data Analysis - The quantitative data (height, weight, duration of surgery, hemodynamic parameters, SpO2, VAS score and serum cortisol levels) will be expressed in the terms of mean and standard deviation while qualitative data (age, ASA physical status, sedation score, CRBD score, other complaints) will be expressed in terms of frequency and percentage. The means of the continuous variables will be compared among the two groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Hemodynamic changes will be compared with the help of t-test statistics. A P<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
|