| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/11/076650 [Registered on: 12/11/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
17/01/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Medical Device Other (Specify) [Suctioning in patients on Mechanical Ventilation] |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A clinical trial comparing the efficacy of PEEP ZEEP technique to conventional method of suctioning in reducing incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation.
|
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Efficacy in Reduction of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Patients with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation with PEEP ZEEP Technique Vs Conventional Method of Suctioning:A Randomised Controlled Study
|
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Rishabh Gaur |
| Designation |
PGJR Dept of Anesthesiology |
| Affiliation |
Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences,Varanasi |
| Address |
Critical Care Unit,Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, NH-2 Bypass, Bhadwar, Varanasi
Varanasi UTTAR PRADESH 221311 India |
| Phone |
9621053590 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
rishi2512gaur@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Sulakshana |
| Designation |
Associate Professor Department of Anesthesiology |
| Affiliation |
Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences,Varanasi |
| Address |
Critical Care Unit,Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, NH-2 Bypass, Bhadwar, Varanasi
Varanasi UTTAR PRADESH 221311 India |
| Phone |
9389848829 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr.sulakshanatripathi@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Sulakshana |
| Designation |
Associate Professor Department of Anesthesiology |
| Affiliation |
Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences,Varanasi |
| Address |
Critical Care Unit,Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences,NH-2 Bypass,Bhadwar,Varanasi
Varanasi UTTAR PRADESH 221311 India |
| Phone |
9389848829 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr.sulakshanatripathi@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences,NH-2,Bhadwar,Varanasi-221311,India |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
NH-2,Bhadwar,Varanasi-221311,U.P.,India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Private medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Rishabh Gaur |
Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences |
Critical Care Unit,Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences,NH-2,Bhadwar,Varanasi-221311 Varanasi UTTAR PRADESH |
9621053590
rishi2512gaur@yahoo.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethical Committee,Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences,Varanasi |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: J159||Unspecified bacterial pneumonia, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Method of Suctioning in patients on mechanical ventilation via Conventional Method |
Patient will be preoxygenated with 100% Fio2 for 1 minute,followed by introduction of atoxic,sterile,PVC 14 FG suction catheter.The catheter will be introduced until resistance is met, and it will then be withdrawn 2–3 cm with a negative pressure of ∼150 mm Hg, applied for 15 s with circular movements
|
| Intervention |
Method of Suctioning in patients on mechanical ventilation via PEEP ZEEP |
Patient will be Ventilated with PEEP 15cm H2O,PIP
40 CM H2O for 1 min and Fio2-20% above baseline via Mindray SV300 ventilator.
After 1minute,PEEP will be abruptly reduced to zero
and bilateral thoracic compression will be given,ventilator will be disconnected and another person will be suctioning out via atoxic,sterile,PVC 14FG suction catheter and post procedure the ventilator will be reconnected without change in initial parameters.
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
99.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
All age more than 18 years on controlled mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Patient/Attendant refusal.
Rib fracture
ICD insitu
Emphysematous bulla
Pneumothorax
Pleural Effusion
Hemodynamic instability requiring noradrenaline more than 10 mcg/min
PEEP requirement more than 12 cm H2O for SpO2 more than 92%.
Severe bronchospasm(PIP-PPlat more than 20 cm H2O) .
Severe Hypoalbuminemia (S.Albumin less than 2.5 g/dl)
Ejection fraction less than 40%.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
The PEEP-ZEEP technique has been proven to be a safe suction technique,which improves oxygenation without altering hemodynamics in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients. Compared to conventional suction technique it produces elevated expiratory flow that increases the movement of secretions towards the glottis.Hence, this elevated expiratory flow should decrease the incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in comparison to conventional method of suctioning.
|
Baseline Samples will be collected before suctioning then,Immediately after then 20 mins post suctioning |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1)To study the effect of suctioning method on PaO2 and PaCo2 in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation.
2) To study the hemodynamic alterations due to suctioning by PEEP ZEEP technique Vs Conventional method in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation |
Immediately before initiation of suctioning, immediately after and 20 minutes post suctioning. |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="192" Sample Size from India="192"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
22/11/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
•Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) refers to pneumonia developed in patients who have been mechanically ventilated for a duration of more than 48 h and is a major cause of hospital morbidity and mortality. Its incidence differs between 5% and 50% in mechanically ventilated patients •Critically ill patients with artificial airways have shown changes in mucociliary clearance with the accumulation of secretions due to sedation, depression of the cough reflex, inadequate cuff pressure, inflammation, and mucosal trauma. •Airway suctioning is often necessary to maintain alveolar permeability and to prevent respiratory tract infection,its classical procedure consists of disconnection from mechanical ventilation, followed by insertion of a suction catheter into the trachea for tracheal suctioning under negative pressure •According to the guidelines of the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC),this procedure may result in numerous side effects,such as risks and complication for developing hypoxia due to reduced tissue oxygenation(Pa02),peripheral oxygen saturation (SPo2),trauma to bronchial mucosa with hemorrhagic secretion ,elevated carbon dioxide levels in the blood(Paco2) ,changes in hemodynamics •Difference between Peak expiratory flow rate and Peak inspiratory flow rate >33L/min facilitates the movements of expectoration/secretions . •Bacterial transfer from naso-oropharynx and gut to the lower respiratory tract in mechanically ventilated patients via endotracheal tube cuff or by direct cross contamination during nursing intervention results in VAP development. •Studies have reported that Fio2 1.0 should be the method of choice to prevent lower levels of Pao2 and Spo2, especially during open endotracheal suctioning, as recommended by the latest guidelines of the AARC. •The PEEP-ZEEP technique is described as a lung inflation through a positive pressure enhancement at the end of expiration (PEEP), followed by rapid lung deflation with an abrupt reduction in the PEEP to 0 cmH2O (ZEEP), associated to a manual bilateral thoracic compression. •The PEEP-ZEEP technique seems to be safe, without alterations on hemodynamic variables, produces elevated expiratory flow and seems to be an alternative technique for the removal of bronchial secretions in patients . Aim is to compare the incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia(VAP) between PEEP ZEEP technique Vs conventional method of suctioning in patients with endotracheal/tracheostomy tubes. . |