| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/07/069839 [Registered on: 03/07/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
28/09/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Multiple Arm Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A multi-center study for children with blood cancer (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) for improving their survival. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
ICiCLe-ALL-24 – The Indian Collaborative Childhood Leukaemia Randomised Trial for Children and Adolescents with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia 2024 |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Venkatraman Radhakrishnan |
| Designation |
Professor Medical Oncology |
| Affiliation |
Cancer Institute (W.I.A) |
| Address |
Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai
Chennai TAMIL NADU 600020 India |
| Phone |
9498082771 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
venkymd@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Venkatraman Radhakrishnan |
| Designation |
Professor Medical Oncology |
| Affiliation |
Cancer Institute (W.I.A) |
| Address |
Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai
Chennai TAMIL NADU 600020 India |
| Phone |
9498082771 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
venkymd@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Venkatraman Radhakrishnan |
| Designation |
Professor Medical Oncology |
| Affiliation |
Cancer Institute (W.I.A) |
| Address |
Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai
Chennai TAMIL NADU 600020 India |
| Phone |
9498082771 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
venkymd@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Cancer Institute |
| Address |
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (W.I.A), Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai, 600020 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 6 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Deepam Pushpam |
AIIMS IRCH |
Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Ansari Nagar New Delhi 110029 South DELHI |
9650629370
deepampushpam@gmail.com |
| Dr Rachna Seth |
AIIMS Pediatrics |
Department of Pediatrics
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Ansari Nagar New Delhi 110029 South DELHI |
9971188687
drrachnaseth1967@gmail.com |
| Dr Venkatraman Radhakrishnan |
Cancer Institute (W.I.A) |
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (W.I.A), Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai Chennai TAMIL NADU |
9498082771
venkymd@gmail.com |
| Dr Richa Jain |
PGIMER Chandigarh |
Department of Pediatrics, APC,
PGIMER, Sector 12
Chandigarh. 160012
Chandigarh CHANDIGARH |
8146738711
docrichajain@gmail.com |
| Dr Niharendu Ghara |
Tata Medical Center |
Department of Pediatric Oncology
Tata Medical Center
Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal 700156 Kolkata WEST BENGAL |
9831771972
niharendu.ghara@tmckolkata.com |
| Dr Nirmalya Roy Moulik |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
Division of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr.E.Borges Road, Mumbai 400012. Mumbai MAHARASHTRA |
7045991385
roymoulik@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
Modification(s)
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 6 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| AIIMS New Delhi |
Approved |
| AIIMS New Delhi |
Approved |
| Cancer Institute (W.I.A) |
Approved |
| PGIMER CHANDIGARH |
Approved |
| Tata Medical Center Kolkata |
Approved |
| Tata Memorial Center |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: C910||Acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Capizzi Methotrexate (R2-A arm) |
Interim maintenance: Methotrexate intravenous 100 mg/m2 given as the initial dose, escalate subsequent doses by 50mg/m2 to toxicity and modify dosage in the following days. Day 1, Day 11, Day 21, Day 31, Day 41. For pre-B ALL intermediate risk and CNS 3 negative high risk. |
| Intervention |
Capizzi methotrexate for BCP-ALL standard risk (SR) and T-ALL. High dose methotrexate (5 gm/m2) for CNS-3 (non-randomised). |
B-cell precursor (BCP-ALL) SR and T-ALL/LL will receive Capizzi Methotrexate in Interim Maintenance and CNS3 patients (BCP-ALL and T-ALL) will receive high-dose methotrexate in Interim Maintenance. |
| Intervention |
High dose methotrexate (R2-B arm) |
Methotrexate: 5 g/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 15 of interim maintenance. Repeated on days 1 and 15 after completion of delayed intensification and before starting maintenance. Total 4 doses. Pre-B ALL intermediate risk and CNS 3 negative high risk. |
| Intervention |
Split dexamethasone in induction (R1-B arm) |
Induction phase: Dexamethasone (PO) 6 mg/m2 in 2-divided doses, note that the maximum permitted dose is 12 mg daily. Intermittent dosing: Days 8 – 14 & 22 – 28, No Taper. For all risk groups after one week prednisolone from days 1-7. |
| Intervention |
Split high-dose methotrexate (non-randomized). |
High-dose methotrexate 5 gm/m2 will be split. The first two cycles will be given during the interim maintenance phase and the last 2 cycles will be given after delayed maintenance. |
| Comparator Agent |
Split Prednisolone in induction (R1-A arm) |
Induction phase: Prednisolone 60 mg/m2 in three divided doses, note that the maximum permitted dose is 120 mg daily. Intermittent dosing: Days 8 – 14 & 22 – 28, No Taper. For all risk groups after one week prednisolone from days 1-7. |
| Intervention |
Vincristine and dexamethasone pulse in maintenance for high-risk patients.(non-randomized) |
BCP-ALL high-risk patients will receive vincristine and 5 days of dexamethasone (6 mg/m2) with each intrathecal methotrexate during maintenance (weeks 1-96). |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
1.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Newly diagnosed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Age less than 1 year
2. Age more than 18 years
3. Mature B-ALL
4. Down Syndrome
5. Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukaemia
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Centralized |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Event free survival between the R1 and R2 randomisation arms. |
3 years and 5 years from inclusion in study. |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Event free survival in comparison to T-ALL cohort in ICiCLe-14 historical cohort.
|
3 years and 5 years from inclusion in study. |
| Overall survival, cummulative incidence of death, cummulative incidence of relapse and toxicity between the randomised arms and non randomised arms with historcial arms. |
3 years and 5 years from inclusion in study. |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="2567" Sample Size from India="2567"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/10/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="5" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Rationale/ gaps in existing knowledge: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer, with an estimated 15,000 children diagnosed in India annually. While the outcome for ALL is ~90% in high-income nations, Indian outcomes are suboptimal. The ICiCle ALL-14 (Indian Childhood CollaborativeLeukemia group) trial, carried out between 2016-2022, standardized the treatment of ALL in India and improved the outcomes of childhood ALL. While much improved as compared to historical Indian data, outcomes are lower than international data. Additionally, relapse rates from the trial are higher than the expected. The ICICLE ALL-24 trial will further optimize the treatment of childhood ALL with the end goal of improving the OS and EFS and decreasing the relapse rate. To this end, improvement in risk stratification of ALL will be done, and treatment strategy will be further refined among the various sub-groups of ALL. Novelty: - In the trial, newer genetic risk stratification strategies will be used to refine the pre-existing risk stratification in ALL including cytogenetic markers: IKZF1del, Philadelphia-like; TCF3::HLF1; Hypodiploidy; iAMP21, and MEF2D. More sensitive assessments for MRD will be developed and used during this study. Novel treatment modifications and adaptations will be assessed in this trial, including, 1. non-randomized modification of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) into 2 blocks of 2-cycles each, as compared to serial administration of 4-cycles over 8-weeks, 2. randomized comparison between high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) versus Capizzi methotrexate (CMTX) in non-standard risk (SR)-ALL, and 3. Randomization between dexamethasone and prednisolone during induction. The end-goal is a reduction in relapse rate while reducing toxicity. Objectives: 1. To improve the outcome of children with ALL in India with enhanced risk-stratification using novel genetic criteria and improved measurable residual disease assessment. 2. To assess whether the use of dexamethasone instead of prednisolone in induction may lead to better EFS, and decreased intramedullary relapses without an increase in toxicity. 3. To assess whether in the Indian context, CMTX may be a better option than HDMTX for ALL. 4. To assess the efficacy of split-administration of HDMTX. |