| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/08/092661 [Registered on: 08/08/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
08/08/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Medical Device Radiation Therapy |
| Study Design |
Single Arm Study |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Testing of a new device using infrared radiation to detect viable cancer in the cervix |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
ViablE Residual Disease at Intracavitary brachytherapy after Chem-radio Therapy I Carcinoma
Cervix:Detection, Characterization and prognostic Significance(VERDICT)
Amplification determination of diagnostic accuracy and prognostic utility HINA |
| Trial Acronym |
VERDICT |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Santam Chakraborty |
| Designation |
Senior Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Tata Medical Center |
| Address |
14 MAR E-W Newtown Action Area 3
North Twentyfour Parganas WEST BENGAL 700156 India |
| Phone |
9831188676 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drsantam@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Santam Chakraborty |
| Designation |
Senior Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Tata Medical Center |
| Address |
14 MAR E-W Newtown Action Area 3
WEST BENGAL 700156 India |
| Phone |
9831188676 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drsantam@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Tapesh Bhattacharyya |
| Designation |
Senior Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Tata Medical Center |
| Address |
14 MAR E-W Newtown Action Area 3
North Twentyfour Parganas WEST BENGAL 700156 India |
| Phone |
9656870171 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
tapesh27@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of Biotechnology 6th 8th Floor, Block 2 and 4th 5th Floor, Block 3 CGO Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi 110 003India |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Department of Biotechnology |
| Address |
Block 2, 6 - 8 floor, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government funding agency |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Santam Chakraborty |
Tata Medical Center |
Department of Radiation Oncology,
14 MAR E-W, Action Area 3, New Town North Twentyfour Parganas WEST BENGAL |
9831188676
drsantam@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Tata Medical Center |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: C538||Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of cervix uteri, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Far Infrared Imaging |
Far infrared imaging at the time of brachytherapy for identification of residual disease. This imaging will be used to determine the presence of viable residual disease. Biopsies will be taken from these areas. Any area which is deemed suspicious will also be biopsied. The areas bearing the residual disease will be compared against the MRI defined disease. Additionally available biopsy will be used as a gold standard. |
| Comparator Agent |
NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
99.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Female |
| Details |
Biopsy proven carcinoma cervix patients who are planned for treatment with definitive concurrent chemoradiation using weekly Cisplatin.
Histology: Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adenosquamous carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma
FIGO 2018 stage I - IIIC.
Have pretreatment biopsy taken at Tata Medical Center or reviewed at Tata Medical Center. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Presence of any bleeding disorder
Presence of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura or any other platelet disorder
HIV Positivity
Unavailable for follow up at Tata Medical Center.
Patients who have undergone chemoradiation / radiation therapy outside.
Presence of cochlear implant
Presence of non-MRI safe implants and pacemakers
Planned for palliative intent radiotherapy
Stage IV patients
Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Prior history of radiation therapy to the pelvis |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Sensitivity and Sepecificity of the device. |
Sensitivity and Sepecificity of the device. |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To determine the prognostic impact of the volume of residual abnormality in MRI (GTres) on:
The clinical complete response rate on MRI at 3 months post-treatment.
|
3 months |
Quantification of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in the biopsy specimens and PD-L1 expression in the tumor and immune cells.
|
At brachytherapy |
| Determine the prognostic impact of the above parameters on disease-free survival |
3 years |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="54" Sample Size from India="54"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/12/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="3" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Title | ViablE Residual Disease at Intracavitary Brachytherapy after Chemo-radioTherapy in Carcinoma Cervix: Detection and characterization using far infrared imaging (VERDICT) | Background & Rationale | Concurrent chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy is the current standard of care in carcinoma cervix but distant metastases are the most common site of failure. Characterization of residual viable disease at cervix at the time of brachytherapy may help personalize adjuvant therapy. Detection of the viable residual disease using MRI is inaccurate. Using a far-infrared imaging device with clinical examination may improve accuracy. | Aim | To develop and test a far-infrared subsurface imaging device to detect viable residual disease at cervix during brachytherapy with greater accuracy. | Objectives and Endpoints | Primary: To compare the specificity and sensitivity of far-infrared imaging device along with clinical examination versus MRI at the time of brachytherapy. Secondary: To determine the prognostic impact of the volume of residual abnormality in MRI (GTres) on: The clinical complete response rate on MRI at 3 months post-treatment Disease-Free survival.
Quantification of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in the biopsy specimens and PD-L1 expression in the tumor and immune cells. Determine the prognostic impact of the above parameters on disease-free survival
| Population & setting | Patient diagnosed with Carcinoma Cervix, who will undergo definitive concurrent chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy with curative intent. Patients with MRI non-compatible implants, cochlear implants, bleeding or platelet disorders will be excluded. | Intervention | Image guided biopsies will be obtained from the cervix at the time of first brachytherapy. Biopsy locations will be determined by the areas of abnormality noted on the pre-brachytherapy MRI imaging as well as the clinical findings combined with far-infrared imaging. Biopsy specimens would be analyzed for the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression. | Study Design | Single arm, prospective, cohort study. | Outcome & Measures | Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of MRI as compared to Clinical examination combined with infrared imaging. The gold standard will be presence of viable tumor in the biopsy sample obtained from the area. The adjusted odds ratio of having a complete response at 3 months per unit change in the volume of GTres. The adjusted hazard ratio of the disease free survival per unit change in the volume of GTres Counts of the TIL expressed in number / mm2 as well as percentage of cells in the biopsy specimen. PD-L1 expression in terms of percentage of cells staining in IHC.
| Study Procedures | Pre-brachytherapy MRI will be done as per usual institutional protocol and the GTres will be mapped on the diagram. GTres volume will also be calculated. During brachytherapy, patients will be examined clinically and will undergo far-infrared imaging which will be again used to map the areas of residual abnormality. Biopsies will be taken from the abnormal area as well as from a normal area. | Statistical Consideration | A sample size of 135 biopsies is required to detect an absolute difference of 15% in the specificity as compared to the specificity of MRI (assumed to be 60%) with a two-sided Type I error of 5% and a power of 80%. This corresponds to a sample size of 54 patients, as patients will have multiple biopsies. An interim analysis will be planned after 54 patients have been accrued and the obtained sensitivity and specificity parameters will be refined to calculate the final sample size which is currently estimated to be 150 patients. | Feasibility | Annually about 100 patients of carcinoma cervix undergo this form of treatment in our center. We expect a further increase in the numbers with the increase in the machine availability in the department. | Significance | In addition to the obvious advantage that this non-invasive imaging device has in terms of use during follow up, we will be able to use the results of the study to prospectively quantitate the prognostic impact of the residual abnormality as well as find out the association between the prognosis and the patterns of viable disease and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. If the method of biopsy acquisition proves successful in identifying viable disease in a large majority of patients, then we can design further studies where the adjuvant therapy is tailored based on the nature of the disease. |
|