| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/08/072738 [Registered on: 20/08/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
27/01/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Medical Device Process of Care Changes |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Crossover Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Mechanical ventilation versus bag valve ventilation in adult cardiac arrest patients during CPR
|
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Six dial mechanical ventilation strategy versus self inflating adult bag valve ventilation in adult cardiac arrest patients undergoing chest compressions- A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority trial
|
| Trial Acronym |
Nil |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
S Vinay |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research |
| Address |
First floor office room,
Emergency medicine department, Emergency and trauma care services block, JIPMER, Pondicherry
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605006 India |
| Phone |
9481717243 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
Vinaysannakki1997@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Manu Ayyan S |
| Designation |
Associate professor |
| Affiliation |
Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research |
| Address |
First Floor Office room, Emergency medicine department, Emergency and trauma care services block, JIPMER, Pondicherry
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605006 India |
| Phone |
9846556133 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
manuayyan@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Manu Ayyan S |
| Designation |
Associate professor |
| Affiliation |
Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research |
| Address |
First floor office room,EMS building Emergency medicine department, Emergency and trauma care services block, JIPMER, Pondicherry
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605006 India |
| Phone |
9846556133 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
manuayyan@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research,
Pondicherry,
PIN code-605006
INDIA |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research |
| Address |
Pondicherry,
PIN code-605006 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| S VINAY |
Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research |
1st FLOOR EMS OFFICE,
EMERGENCY SERVICES BLOCK. Pondicherry PONDICHERRY |
9481717243
Vinaysannakki1997@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE INTERVENTIONAL STUDIES CDSCO Reg no. ECR/342/Inst/PY/2013/RR-19 |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
SELF INFLATING ADULT BAG VALVE VENTILATION |
As it is a randomized cross-over trial the same patient will receive both intervention and the control arm based on the sequence of randomization. Patients who are first randomized to receive breaths from mechanical ventilation, now the patient will be connected to self inflating adult bag valve device. The breath volumes over 10 breaths will be recorded over 1 minute with the help of video recording device pointed at the screen of flow meter. |
| Intervention |
SIX DIAL MECHANICAL VENTILATION STRATEGY |
All the eligible adult intubated cardiac arrest patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Patients who fail to achieve ROSC (Return of spontaneous circulation) and reach termination-of-resuscitation criteria and in whom, continued resuscitation is declared futile by the treating team of emergency physician (who are not part of the study), will be randomized to either Mechanical ventilator or self inflating adult bag valve ventilation arm as per allocation. Patients randomized to Mechanical Ventilator arm (MV) will be ventilated with Hamilton T1 ventilator. The ventilator will be calibrated and checked for leaks. The ventilator setting will be as per six dial strategy. We will set the tidal volume as 8 ml/kg ( predicted if weight unknown - 500ml for male and 400 ml for female), maximum peak inspiratory pressure as 60 cm H2O , FiO2 100%, PEEP 0 cm H2O, Flow trigger off, Respiratory rate 10/min and I:E ratio of 1:5. The primed ventilator will be connected to patient. The breath volumes over 10 breath will be recorded over 1 minute with the help of a video recording device pointed at the screen of the flow meter. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
99.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Intubated adult cardiac arrest patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department
and meeting the termination of resuscitation criteria
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Age less than 18 years .
2.Pregnant women.
3.Bleeding or secretions in the endotracheal tube.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Stratified block randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To compare the efficacy of mechanical ventilator with self inflating adult bag valve ventilation in delivery of tidal volume during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in Emergency medicine department. |
5 minutes |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To compare ET CO2 levels on ventilation with mechanical ventilator and bag-valve ventilation. |
5 minutes |
| To compare expiratory tidal volume on ventilation with mechanical ventilator and Bag valve ventilation |
5 minutes |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="100" Sample Size from India="100"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "104"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="104" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
27/08/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
01/01/2026 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
Brief Summary
Modification(s)
|
The American Heart Association estimates that approximately 1000 cardiac arrests occur each day. The American Heart Association updated its recommendations in 2020 and suggested that a tidal volume of approximately 500 to 600 ml, sufficient to cause a visible chest rise, provides adequate ventilation while minimising the risk of overdistension or gastric inflation. Airway management and ventilation during CPR are essential for successful resuscitation in these patients. Studies have compared mechanical ventilation with bag-valve ventilation for gas exchange and have shown that mechanical ventilation is at least feasible and safe for use during CPR in intubated cardiac arrest patients. Another study, using a physical model during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, found that conventional ventilation modes during simulated CPR manoeuvres produced pressures and volumes similar to those reported with bag-valve masks. Studies have yet to be conducted to determine the efficacy of tidal-volume delivery via mechanical ventilation and bag-valve ventilation in cardiac arrest patients. This study will evaluate the efficacy of tidal volume delivery during mechanical ventilation versus bag-valve ventilation in adult intubated cardiac arrest patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency medicine department.
|