| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/09/074170 [Registered on: 23/09/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
19/08/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A study to find out if PNF stretching or Kaltenborn mobilization helps reduce pain and improve movement in people with frozen shoulder. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A comparative study of PNF(Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) stretch vs kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis-A randomized control trail |
| Trial Acronym |
Nil |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Nandini A H |
| Designation |
PG student |
| Affiliation |
Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy |
| Address |
258/A,Health city, Bommasndra, industrial area, Anekal taluk,Bangalore-560099
Narayana hrudayalaya international wing physiotherapy center,room no.102 258/A,Health city, Bommasndra, industrial area, Anekal taluk,Bangalore-560099
Narayana hrudayalaya international wing physiotherapy center,room no.102 Bangalore KARNATAKA 560099 India |
| Phone |
6363669238 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
nandinihiregouda@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr.Smruti swagatika dash |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy |
| Address |
258/A,Health city, Bommasndra, industrial area, Anekal taluk,Bangalore-560099
Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy 258/A,Health city, Bommasndra, industrial area, Anekal taluk,Bangalore-560099
Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy Bangalore KARNATAKA 560099 India |
| Phone |
9448552026 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ssdashpt@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Nandini A H |
| Designation |
PG student |
| Affiliation |
Narayana hrudayalaya institution of physiotherapy |
| Address |
258/A,Health city, Bommasndra, industrial area, Anekal taluk,Bangalore-560099
Narayana hrudayalaya inetnational wing physiotherapy center,room no.102 258/A,Health city, Bommasndra, industrial area, Anekal taluk,Bangalore-560099
Narayana hrudayalaya international wing physiotherapy center,room no.102 Bangalore KARNATAKA 560099 India |
| Phone |
6363669238 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
nandinihiregouda@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Physiotherapy OPD-Narayana hrudayalaya international wing physiotherapy center,room no.102
258/A,Health city, Bommasndra, industrial area, Anekal taluk,Bangalore-560099
Karnataka,India |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Nil |
| Address |
Nil |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [[.]] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| DrNandini A H |
Narayana hrudayala institution of physiotherapy |
Narayana hrudayalaya international wing physiotherapy center,room no.102 258/A,Health city,Bommasandra industrial area, Anekal taluk.
Bangalore - 560099 Bangalore KARNATAKA |
6363669238
nandinihiregouda@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Narayana hrudayalaya academic ethical committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: M729||Fibroblastic disorder, unspecified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Kaltenborn Mobilization |
This group will undergo Kaltenborn Mobilization with conventional therapy (standard protocol of adhesive capsulitis). The mobilization glides that will be given are caudal, and ventral glides. The glides will be given at a rate of 5 sets of 6 to 10 repetitions thrice a week for 4 weeks. The Pain, and SPADI these outcome measures that will be assessed pre- and post-intervention.
|
| Intervention |
PNF Stretching |
This group will undergo Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Stretch: Administered in a diagonal (D2) flexion and extension pattern for 5 repetitions per set, 2 sets per session, 1 session per day, 3 days per week for 1 month. The Pain, and SPADI these outcome measures that will be will be assessed pre- and post-intervention |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
30.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Unilateral limb involvement
Subjects with second and third stage of adhesive capsulitis
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Subjects with post traumatic immobilization
Subjects with cognitive impairment
Subjects with previous surgery /arthroscopy |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Other |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Other |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| NPRS (Numerical pain rating scale) |
After the 4 weeks of intervention application |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| SPADI(Shoulder Pain And Disability Index) |
After the 4 weeks of intervention application |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="54" Sample Size from India="54"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
04/10/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="6" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Closed to Recruitment of Participants |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
AIMS To find out the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation Stretch in comparison with kaltenborn mobilization on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE · To compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation Stretch and kaltenborn mobilization technique in patients with adhesive capsulitis. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE · 1. To compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and kaltenborn mobilization technique in patients with adhesive capsulitis. · 2.Evaluate proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and kaltenborn mobilization technique effectively reduces pain among patients with adhesive capsulitis. · 3.To assess proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and kaltenborn mobilization technique are effective in improving shoulder function among patients with adhesive capsulitis.
Hypothesis Null Hypothesis 1.There will be no significant effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. 2.There will be no significant effect of kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. 3. There will be no significant difference of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch compared to kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Alternate Hypothesis 1.There will be significant effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. 2.There will be significant effect of kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. 3. There will be significant difference of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch compared to kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. |