Endotracheal Intubation is a life-saving procedure performed in emergency departments (EDs) across the globe. Under some circumstances, it has been found that; it seems pretty much impossible to align the axes, making direct visualization of the laryngeal inlet difficult or impossible with direct laryngoscopy and there by proving it to be a futile one. But the most detrimental part of this we lose a patient due to unnecessary delay in intubation. So, these cases present as a particularly challenging situation for emergency physicians and there what the video laryngoscopes does come into action. The faster intubation time escalating the ease of intubation in video laryngoscopes. The first pass success rate of video intubation rely on cumulative factors i.e blade size, blade type, design, structural configurations, angulation of blade (obtuse /acute. It is generally accepted that using a video laryngoscope is associated with an improved visualization of the glottis. However, correctly placing the endotracheal tube might be challenging. Channelled video laryngoscopy blades have an endotracheal tube already pre-loaded, allowing to advance the tube once the glottis is visualized. We hypothesized that use of a channel blade with pre-loaded endotracheal tube results in a faster intubation, compared to a curved Macintosh blade video laryngoscope. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled study has examined the relative performance of Chanell blade with that non-Chanell blade of video laryngoscope in emergency set up for tracheal intubation. The aim of the study was to compare the emergency tracheal intubation performances of the video laryngoscope non channelled blade with that Chanell blade in the emergency department.